• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前景相对性:风险下选择选项如何影响决策

Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk.

作者信息

Stewart Neil, Chater Nick, Stott Henry P, Reimers Stian

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, England.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):23-46. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.23.

DOI:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.23
PMID:12656296
Abstract

In many theories of decision under risk (e.g., expected utility theory, rank-dependent utility theory, and prospect theory), the utility of a prospect is independent of other options in the choice set. The experiments presented here show a large effect of the available options, suggesting instead that prospects are valued relative to one another. The judged certainty equivalent for a prospect is strongly influenced by the options available. Similarly, the selection of a preferred prospect is strongly influenced by the prospects available. Alternative theories of decision under risk (e.g., the stochastic difference model, multialternative decision field theory, and range frequency theory), where prospects are valued relative to one another, can provide an account of these context effects.

摘要

在许多风险决策理论中(例如,预期效用理论、等级依赖效用理论和前景理论),一个前景的效用独立于选择集中的其他选项。此处展示的实验表明了可用选项的巨大影响,这表明前景是相对于彼此进行估值的。一个前景的判断确定性等价物受到可用选项的强烈影响。同样,对首选前景的选择也受到可用前景的强烈影响。风险决策的其他理论(例如,随机差异模型、多选项决策场理论和范围频率理论),其中前景是相对于彼此进行估值的,可以解释这些情境效应。

相似文献

1
Prospect relativity: how choice options influence decision under risk.前景相对性:风险下选择选项如何影响决策
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):23-46. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.23.
2
Modeling choice paradoxes under risk: From prospect theories to sampling-based accounts.风险下的选择悖论建模:从展望理论到基于抽样的解释。
Cogn Psychol. 2020 May;118:101258. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.101258. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
3
Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models.针对随机效用模型严格检验多选项决策场理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1331-48. doi: 10.1037/a0035159. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
4
Preference reversals during risk elicitation.风险 elicitation 过程中的偏好反转。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Mar;149(3):585-589. doi: 10.1037/xge0000655. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
5
New paradoxes of risky decision making.风险决策的新悖论
Psychol Rev. 2008 Apr;115(2):463-501. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.463.
6
The Attraction Effect Modulates Reward Prediction Errors and Intertemporal Choices.吸引力效应调节奖励预测误差和跨期选择。
J Neurosci. 2017 Jan 11;37(2):371-382. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2532-16.2016.
7
Academic decision making and prospect theory.学术决策与前景理论。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Aug;109(1):289-300. doi: 10.2466/01.07.20.PR0.109.4.289-300.
8
Receptor theory and biological constraints on value.受体理论与价值的生物学限制
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 May;1104:301-9. doi: 10.1196/annals.1390.013. Epub 2007 Apr 13.
9
Attraction Effect in Risky Choice Can Be Explained by Subjective Distance Between Choice Alternatives.风险选择中的吸引效应可以用选择备选方案之间的主观距离来解释。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 21;7(1):8942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06968-5.
10
Prospect balancing theory: Bounded rationality of drivers' speed choice.前景平衡理论:驾驶员速度选择的有限理性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Feb;63:49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.10.028. Epub 2013 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Do different survey methods affect physicians' stated work preferences? Findings from a discrete choice experiment in Eastern China.不同的调查方法会影响医生表明的工作偏好吗?来自中国东部一项离散选择实验的结果。
Front Sociol. 2024 Dec 20;9:1474795. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1474795. eCollection 2024.
2
Context-dependent choice and evaluation in real-world consumer behavior.现实世界消费者行为中的情境依赖选择与评价。
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 22;12(1):17744. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-22416-5.
3
Adaptation of utility functions to reward distribution in rhesus monkeys.
适应恒河猴的效用函数以奖励分布。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104764. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104764. Epub 2021 May 14.
4
Neural correlates of visual attention during risky decision evidence integration.风险决策证据整合过程中视觉注意的神经关联。
Neuroimage. 2021 Jul 1;234:117979. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117979. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
5
The delay-reward heuristic: What do people expect in intertemporal choice tasks?延迟奖励启发式:人们在跨期选择任务中期望得到什么?
Judgm Decis Mak. 2020 Sep;15(5):611-629.
6
Salience-Driven Value Construction for Adaptive Choice under Risk.基于突显的风险自适应选择下的价值建构。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jun 26;39(26):5195-5209. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2522-18.2019. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
Enhanced motivation of cognitive control in Parkinson's disease.帕金森病认知控制的动机增强。
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Sep;48(6):2374-2384. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14137. Epub 2018 Sep 16.
8
Normalized value coding explains dynamic adaptation in the human valuation process.归一化价值编码解释了人类估值过程中的动态适应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Nov 28;114(48):12696-12701. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715293114. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
9
A unifying Bayesian account of contextual effects in value-based choice.基于价值选择中情境效应的统一贝叶斯解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Oct 5;13(10):e1005769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005769. eCollection 2017 Oct.
10
Neural processes mediating contextual influences on human choice behaviour.介导上下文对人类选择行为影响的神经过程。
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 18;7:12416. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12416.