Suppr超能文献

参与中风预防试验的患者中风风险因素的比较。

A comparison of stroke risk factors in patients enrolled in stroke prevention trials.

作者信息

Lynch G F, Leurgans S, Raman R, Barboi A, Gorelick P B

机构信息

Department of Neurological Science, Rush University, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2001 Mar;93(3):79-86.

Abstract

The high prevalence of stroke risk factors may explain, in part, the high incidence of stroke in African Americans. To further investigate the role of stroke risk factors, we compared stroke risk factor profiles of patients in the African-American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS) with those in other stroke prevention studies in which the enrollees were predominately white. The baseline characteristics of the AAASPS enrollees obtained from an interim AAASPS database of 1,087 patients from 65 centers in the U.S. between December 1995 and June 1999 was compared to the baseline characteristics of 53,293 predominantly non-African American patients enrolled in 23 other stroke prevention studies (pNAA). Percentages were reported for qualitative characteristics, and means and standard deviations (SDs) for quantitative characteristics. For selected qualitative characteristics, 95% confidence intervals were given for population percentages in each study. The comparison of baseline characteristics showed that hypertension was more prevalent in AAASPS (84% [95% CI 82.2, 86.61) compared to pNAA trial patients (range of 27% to 67%). Diabetes mellitus was more common in AAASPS (39.1%) compared to pNAA trial patients (17.1%). Cardiac disease, however, was less common in AAASPS than in pNAA trials. The frequency of baseline characteristics of AAASPS patients is different from those of pNAA studies. Risk factor profiles are important as they may help to predict stroke subtype and outcome. Furthermore, the differences in baseline characteristics may portend differences in response to treatment and incidence of adverse events.

摘要

中风风险因素的高流行率可能在一定程度上解释了非裔美国人中风的高发病率。为了进一步研究中风风险因素的作用,我们比较了非裔美国人抗血小板中风预防研究(AAASPS)中患者的中风风险因素概况与其他中风预防研究中患者的概况,其他研究的受试者主要为白人。将1995年12月至1999年6月期间从美国65个中心的1087例患者的AAASPS中期数据库中获得的AAASPS受试者的基线特征,与纳入其他23项中风预防研究(pNAA)的53293例主要为非非裔美国人的患者的基线特征进行比较。定性特征报告百分比,定量特征报告均值和标准差(SD)。对于选定的定性特征,给出了每项研究中人群百分比的95%置信区间。基线特征比较显示,与pNAA试验患者(范围为27%至67%)相比,高血压在AAASPS中更为普遍(84%[95%CI 82.2,86.6])。与pNAA试验患者(17.1%)相比,糖尿病在AAASPS中更为常见(39.1%)。然而,心脏病在AAASPS中比在pNAA试验中更少见。AAASPS患者的基线特征频率与pNAA研究不同。风险因素概况很重要,因为它们可能有助于预测中风亚型和结局。此外,基线特征的差异可能预示着治疗反应和不良事件发生率的差异。

相似文献

6
Effect of sex on outcome after recurrent stroke in African Americans: results from the African American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Jul-Aug;19(4):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2009.05.008. Epub 2010 May 4.
7
Sex and Race Differences in the Association of Incident Ischemic Stroke With Risk Factors.
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Feb 1;76(2):179-186. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.3862.
8
Hypertension-related disease in African Americans. Factors underlying disparities in illness and its outcome.
Postgrad Med. 2002 Oct;112(4):24-6, 29-30, 33-4 passim. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2002.10.1331.
9
Community Engagement: Lessons Learned From the AAASPS and SDBA.
Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):654-662. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034554. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
African American antiplatelet stroke prevention study: Clinical trial design.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1998 Nov-Dec;7(6):426-34. doi: 10.1016/s1052-3057(98)80127-4.
3
Ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study of incidence and risk factors.
Stroke. 1999 Dec;30(12):2513-6. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.12.2513.
4
Secondary prevention of ischemic stroke: A 1998 US perspective.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999;9 Suppl 3:37-44. doi: 10.1159/000047553.
5
Stroke mortality in blacks. Disturbing trends.
Stroke. 1999 Aug;30(8):1711-5. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.8.1711.
10
Cerebrovascular disease in African Americans.
Stroke. 1998 Dec;29(12):2656-64. doi: 10.1161/01.str.29.12.2656.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验