Suppr超能文献

招募三角:非裔美国人参加、拒绝参加或自愿退出临床试验的原因。来自非裔美国人抗血小板卒中预防研究(AAASPS)的中期报告。

The recruitment triangle: reasons why African Americans enroll, refuse to enroll, or voluntarily withdraw from a clinical trial. An interim report from the African-American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS).

作者信息

Gorelick P B, Harris Y, Burnett B, Bonecutter F J

机构信息

Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 1998 Mar;90(3):141-5.

Abstract

Recruitment and retention of study subjects are key to the success of a clinical trial. In the case of minority patients, this may be challenging as minority patients have been underserved by the medical health-care system. Furthermore, minority patients are more likely to experience barriers to entry into a clinical trial such as mistrust of the medical system, economic disadvantages, lack of awareness of study programs, and communication barriers. An open-ended questionnaire was used to determine reasons why subjects in the African-American Antiplatelet Stroke Prevention Study (AAASPS) remained in the study or voluntarily withdrew in the absence of an adverse event. Potential enrollees who refused to participate in the AAASPS also were queried. Enrollees who remained in the program consistently stated that they participated to reduce the risk of stroke recurrence and to help others by finding a "cure" for stroke. Those who withdrew or refused to participate consistently stated that they were afraid of being used as "guinea pigs." A "recruitment triangle" emerged that might predict a patient's likelihood of participation in a clinical trial. The sides of the triangle include the patient, key family members and friends, and the primary medical doctor and other medical personnel. The organizers of a clinical trial need to be aware of the "recruitment triangle" and establish strategies to heighten and maintain its integrity.

摘要

招募和留住研究对象是临床试验成功的关键。对于少数族裔患者而言,这可能具有挑战性,因为医疗保健系统为少数族裔患者提供的服务不足。此外,少数族裔患者更有可能在进入临床试验时遇到障碍,例如对医疗系统的不信任、经济劣势、对研究项目缺乏了解以及沟通障碍。采用开放式问卷调查来确定非裔美国人抗血小板卒中预防研究(AAASPS)中的研究对象继续参与研究或在无不良事件的情况下自愿退出的原因。还询问了拒绝参与AAASPS的潜在入组者。继续参与该项目的入组者一致表示,他们参与是为了降低卒中复发风险,并通过找到卒中的“治愈方法”来帮助他人。那些退出或拒绝参与的人一致表示,他们害怕被当作“小白鼠”。由此出现了一个“招募三角”,它可能预测患者参与临床试验的可能性。这个三角形的三条边包括患者、关键家庭成员和朋友以及主治医生和其他医务人员。临床试验的组织者需要了解“招募三角”,并制定策略来增强和保持其完整性。

相似文献

10
Involving South Asian patients in clinical trials.让南亚患者参与临床试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Oct;8(42):iii, 1-109. doi: 10.3310/hta8420.

引用本文的文献

6
Race and sex differences in dropout from the STRRIDE trials.STRRIDE试验中退出情况的种族和性别差异。
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Jul 10;5:1215704. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1215704. eCollection 2023.
9
Community Engagement: Lessons Learned From the AAASPS and SDBA.社区参与:AAASPS 和 SDBA 的经验教训。
Stroke. 2022 Mar;53(3):654-662. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034554. Epub 2022 Jan 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Consent, confidentiality, and research.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Mar 20;336(12):869-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199703203361209.
7
Clinical trial participation. Viewpoints from racial/ethnic groups.临床试验参与:种族/族裔群体的观点
Cancer. 1994 Nov 1;74(9 Suppl):2687-91. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9+<2687::aid-cncr2820741817>3.0.co;2-b.
8
The dilemma for women of color in clinical trials.
J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 1994 Jul-Aug;49(4):105-9.
9
Clinical trials face lack of minority group volunteers.
Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):178. doi: 10.1038/373178a0.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验