Choong Karen, Chatrkaw Phornlert, Frndova Helena, Cox Peter N
Department of Critical Care Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2003 Jan;4(1):69-73. doi: 10.1097/00130478-200301000-00014.
Disconnecting the endotracheal tube from the ventilator causes significant loss in lung volume, which is further exacerbated by suctioning. In-line catheter suction systems have putative benefits over open catheter suction by maintaining positive pressure, thereby minimizing hypoxemia and hemodynamic instability. However, there is a theoretical risk of generating large negative airway pressures and auto-cycling of the ventilator with in-line catheter suction systems. We studied the effects on lung volume with both these techniques.
Open, randomized, crossover, clinical trial.
Pediatric critical care unit.
Fourteen paralyzed patients, age 6 days to 13 yrs.
Each patient, acting as his or her own control, was suctioned with an in-line catheter suction system and open catheter suction. Each suction maneuver was standardized. Changes in lung volume were measured by inductance plethysmography. Heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were continuously monitored.
Total lung volume loss was greater with open catheter suction compared with in-line catheter suction systems (p = .008). The most significant amount of lung volume loss associated with open catheter suction appears to be related to ventilator disconnection, rather than actual suctioning. Patients with decreased pulmonary compliance (< 0.8 mL/cm H2O/kg) demonstrated a greater loss in lung volume, both absolute and relative, as a result of ventilator disconnection (p = .038 and .006, respectively). Patients suctioned with open catheter suction desaturated to a greater extent than patients suctioned with in-line catheter suction (p = .026). There was evidence of ventilator triggering during the actual suction maneuver in all patients during in-line catheter suctions.
The most significant loss in lung volume during suctioning occurs primarily during ventilator disconnection. Hence, open catheter suction results in greater lung volume loss when compared with in-line catheter suction. We suggest that in-line catheter suction is preferable, especially in patients with significant lung disease and who require high positive end-expiratory pressures, to avoid alveolar derecruitment and exacerbating hypoxemia during endotracheal tube suctioning.
将气管导管与呼吸机断开会导致肺容积显著减少,而吸痰会进一步加剧这种情况。内置导管吸痰系统通过维持正压,相较于开放式导管吸痰可能具有潜在优势,从而将低氧血症和血流动力学不稳定降至最低。然而,使用内置导管吸痰系统存在产生较大气道负压和呼吸机自动循环的理论风险。我们研究了这两种技术对肺容积的影响。
开放、随机、交叉临床试验。
儿科重症监护病房。
14名瘫痪患者,年龄6天至13岁。
每位患者作为自身对照,分别使用内置导管吸痰系统和开放式导管吸痰进行吸痰。每次吸痰操作均标准化。通过感应体积描记法测量肺容积变化。持续监测心率、血压和血氧饱和度。
与内置导管吸痰系统相比,开放式导管吸痰导致的总肺容积损失更大(p = 0.008)。与开放式导管吸痰相关的最显著肺容积损失似乎与呼吸机断开有关,而非实际吸痰过程。肺顺应性降低(< 0.8 mL/cm H₂O/kg)的患者,由于呼吸机断开,无论是绝对还是相对肺容积损失都更大(分别为p = 0.038和0.006)。使用开放式导管吸痰的患者比使用内置导管吸痰的患者血氧饱和度下降幅度更大(p = 0.026)。在所有使用内置导管吸痰的患者实际吸痰过程中,均有呼吸机触发的证据。
吸痰过程中最显著的肺容积损失主要发生在呼吸机断开期间。因此,与内置导管吸痰相比,开放式导管吸痰导致的肺容积损失更大。我们建议,尤其是对于患有严重肺部疾病且需要高呼气末正压的患者,内置导管吸痰更为可取,以避免在气管导管吸痰期间肺泡萎陷和低氧血症加重。