Department of Paediatrics, Division of Paediatric Critical Care Medicine, Beatrix Children's Hospital Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, The University of Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Critical Care, Anaesthesiology, Peri-operative and Emergency Medicine (CAPE), the University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1764-1780. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4920-z. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
PURPOSE: Much of the common practice in paediatric mechanical ventilation is based on personal experiences and what paediatric critical care practitioners have adopted from adult and neonatal experience. This presents a barrier to planning and interpretation of clinical trials on the use of specific and targeted interventions. We aim to establish a European consensus guideline on mechanical ventilation of critically children. METHODS: The European Society for Paediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care initiated a consensus conference of international European experts in paediatric mechanical ventilation to provide recommendations using the Research and Development/University of California, Los Angeles, appropriateness method. An electronic literature search in PubMed and EMBASE was performed using a combination of medical subject heading terms and text words related to mechanical ventilation and disease-specific terms. RESULTS: The Paediatric Mechanical Ventilation Consensus Conference (PEMVECC) consisted of a panel of 15 experts who developed and voted on 152 recommendations related to the following topics: (1) general recommendations, (2) monitoring, (3) targets of oxygenation and ventilation, (4) supportive measures, (5) weaning and extubation readiness, (6) normal lungs, (7) obstructive diseases, (8) restrictive diseases, (9) mixed diseases, (10) chronically ventilated patients, (11) cardiac patients and (12) lung hypoplasia syndromes. There were 142 (93.4%) recommendations with "strong agreement". The final iteration of the recommendations had none with equipoise or disagreement. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations should help to harmonise the approach to paediatric mechanical ventilation and can be proposed as a standard-of-care applicable in daily clinical practice and clinical research.
目的:儿科机械通气的许多常见实践都是基于个人经验,以及儿科重症监护医生从成人和新生儿经验中借鉴的内容。这给特定和靶向干预措施使用的临床试验的规划和解释带来了障碍。我们旨在制定一份关于危重症儿童机械通气的欧洲共识指南。
方法:欧洲儿科和新生儿重症监护学会发起了一次国际欧洲儿科机械通气专家共识会议,使用研究和开发/加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校适宜性方法提供建议。在 PubMed 和 EMBASE 中进行了电子文献检索,使用了与机械通气和疾病特异性术语相关的医学主题词和文本词的组合。
结果:儿科机械通气共识会议(PEMVECC)由 15 名专家组成,他们制定并对 152 项与以下主题相关的建议进行了投票:(1)一般建议,(2)监测,(3)氧合和通气目标,(4)支持措施,(5)撤机和拔管准备,(6)正常肺,(7)阻塞性疾病,(8)限制性疾病,(9)混合性疾病,(10)长期通气患者,(11)心脏患者和(12)肺发育不良综合征。有 142 项(93.4%)建议得到“强烈一致”。建议的最终版本没有平衡或不同意的情况。
结论:这些建议应该有助于协调儿科机械通气的方法,并可以作为适用于日常临床实践和临床研究的护理标准提出。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013-9
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2010-3
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025-6-20
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2025-5-30
Intensive Care Med. 2025-5-12
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017-2
BMC Pulm Med. 2016-11-29
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016-8
Intensive Care Med. 2016-6-18
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016-5
Ann Intensive Care. 2016-12
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2016-2
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016-2