Suppr超能文献

玷污层预处理对牙本质粘结强度的影响。

Influence of smear layer pretreatments on bond strength to dentin.

作者信息

Chaves Patricia, Giannini Marcelo, Ambrosano Glaúcia M Bovi

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP,Brazil.

出版信息

J Adhes Dent. 2002 Fall;4(3):191-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the tensile bond strength of two self-etching adhesive systems and one one-bottle system applied on dentin surfaces after different smear layer treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The crowns of 36 extracted third molars were transversally sectioned with a diamond saw to expose dentin. Flat dentin surfaces were abraded wet with 600-grit SiC paper and randomly assigned to 12 groups, according to three adhesive systems--Prime & Bond NT (PB), Clearfil Mega Bond (CMB) and Etch & Prime 3.0 (EP)--and four dentin surface treatments: direct application over smear layer (no treatment), sandblasting with 50 microm Al2O3 for 10 s, etching with 36% phosphoric acid for 15 s, or conditioning with 0.5 M EDTA for 2 min. Composite "crowns" (6.0 mm high) were incrementally built on the bonded surfaces and teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C. Teeth were vertically, serially sectioned in both x and y directions to obtain bonded specimens of approximately 0.8 mm2 cross-sectional area. Each specimen was tested in tension in a universal testing machine at 0.5 mm/min.

RESULTS

Overall microtensile bond strength (MPa) was 40.43 +/- 7.63 for PB, 27.03 +/- 8.40 for CMB, and 14.73 +/- 3.91 for EP. Mean bond strength for PB was significantly higher than self-etching systems. No significant differences were observed among smear layer treatments within the same dentin adhesive.

CONCLUSION

Bond strength values were significantly different according to the adhesive system used. Different smear layer treatments prior to bonding did not affect tensile bond strength within the same bonding agent.

摘要

目的

评估两种自酸蚀粘结系统和一种单组分系统在不同玷污层处理后应用于牙本质表面时的拉伸粘结强度。

材料与方法

用金刚石锯将36颗拔除的第三磨牙牙冠横向切开以暴露牙本质。用600目碳化硅砂纸湿磨平坦的牙本质表面,并根据三种粘结系统——Prime & Bond NT(PB)、Clearfil Mega Bond(CMB)和Etch & Prime 3.0(EP)——以及四种牙本质表面处理方法随机分为12组:直接应用于玷污层(未处理)、用50微米氧化铝喷砂10秒、用36%磷酸酸蚀15秒或用0.5M乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)处理2分钟。在粘结表面逐层构建复合“牙冠”(高6.0毫米),并将牙齿储存在37℃的蒸馏水中。沿x和y方向对牙齿进行垂直连续切片,以获得横截面积约为0.8平方毫米的粘结标本。每个标本在万能试验机中以0.5毫米/分钟的速度进行拉伸测试。

结果

PB的总体微拉伸粘结强度(MPa)为40.43±7.63,CMB为27.03±8.40,EP为14.73±3.91。PB的平均粘结强度显著高于自酸蚀系统。在相同的牙本质粘结剂中,玷污层处理之间未观察到显著差异。

结论

根据所使用的粘结系统,粘结强度值有显著差异。粘结前不同的玷污层处理在同一粘结剂内不影响拉伸粘结强度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验