Approaches to cell biology teaching: a primer on standards.
作者信息
Tanner Kimberly, Allen Deborah
机构信息
University of California at San Francisco, Science & Health Education Partnership, San Francisco, California 94143-0905, USA.
出版信息
Cell Biol Educ. 2002 Winter;1(4):95-100. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-09-0046.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Approaches to cell biology teaching: a primer on standards.细胞生物学教学方法：标准入门
Cell Biol Educ. 2002 Winter;1(4):95-100. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-09-0046.
2
Bioinformatics in high school biology curricula: a study of state science standards.高中生物课程中的生物信息学：对州科学标准的一项研究
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2008 Spring;7(1):155-62. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-05-0026.
3
Is bio2010 the right blueprint for the biology of the future?《2010年生物学愿景规划》是未来生物学的正确蓝图吗？
Cell Biol Educ. 2003 Winter;2(4):224-7. doi: 10.1187/cbe.03-10-0039.
4
Advanced high school biology in an era of rapid change: a summary of the biology panel report from the NRC Committee on Programs for Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in American High Schools.快速变革时代的高中进阶生物学：美国高中数学与科学进阶学习项目委员会（NRC）生物学小组报告摘要
Cell Biol Educ. 2002 Winter;1(4):123-7. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-09-0038.
5
Commentary: Bio2010--new challenges for biology educators.评论：《生物学2010》——生物学教育工作者面临的新挑战。
Cell Biol Educ. 2003 Summer;2(2):87-91. doi: 10.1187/cbe.03-02-0005.
6
National standards for high school psychology curricula.《高中心理学课程国家标准》
Am Psychol. 2013 Jan;68(1):32-40. doi: 10.1037/a0029374. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
7
Fueling educational reform: Bio2010--biology for the future.推动教育改革：《2010年生物学课程标准》——面向未来的生物学
Cell Biol Educ. 2003 Summer;2(2):85-6. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-11-0053.
8
A comprehensive analysis of high school genetics standards: are states keeping pace with modern genetics?对高中遗传学标准的全面分析：各州是否跟上现代遗传学的步伐？
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2011 Fall;10(3):318-27. doi: 10.1187/cbe.10-09-0122.
9
Relevance. Pharmacology in the high-school classroom.相关性。高中课堂中的药理学。
Science. 2007 Sep 28;317(5846):1871-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1146811.
10
Relevance and rigor in premedical education.医学预科教育中的相关性与严谨性。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 17;359(3):221-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0803098.
引用本文的文献
1
Few LGBTQ+ Science and Engineering Instructors Come Out to Students, Despite Potential Benefits.尽管可能有好处，但很少有 LGBTQ+ 科学和工程教师向学生出柜。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Jun;23(2):ar17. doi: 10.1187/cbe.23-10-0181.
2
Learning partnerships between undergraduate biology students and younger learners.本科生物学专业学生与低龄学习者之间的学习伙伴关系。
Microbiol Educ. 2004 May;5:21-9. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v5.74.
3
Meeting the challenge of science literacy: project 2061 efforts to improve science education.应对科学素养挑战：2061计划提升科学教育的努力。
Cell Biol Educ. 2004 Spring;3(1):28-30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.03-10-0016.
4
The development of a conceptual framework and tools to assess undergraduates' principled use of models in cellular biology.发展一个概念框架和工具，以评估本科生在细胞生物学中对模型的有原则的使用。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Winter;9(4):441-52. doi: 10.1187/cbe.09-11-0082.
5
A faculty team works to create content linkages among various courses to increase meaningful learning of targeted concepts of microbiology.一个教师团队致力于在各类课程之间建立内容联系，以增强对微生物学目标概念的有意义学习。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Summer;6(2):155-62. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-12-0212.
6
National and state standards in science and their potential influence on undergraduate science education.国家和州的科学标准及其对本科科学教育的潜在影响。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006 Fall;5(3):204-9. doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-05-0162.
7
Strategies for avoiding reinventing the precollege education and outreach wheel.避免重复开展大学预科教育及推广工作的策略。
Genetics. 2004 Apr;166(4):1601-9. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1601.
Zotero 插件