Suppr超能文献

基于基础血浆胰岛素和葡萄糖水平得出的几种胰岛素敏感性指数与最小模型指数的比较。

Comparison of several insulin sensitivity indices derived from basal plasma insulin and glucose levels with minimal model indices.

作者信息

García-Estévez D A, Araújo-Vilar D, Fiestras-Janeiro G, Saavedra-González A, Cabezas-Cerrato J

机构信息

Service of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Faculty of Medicine. University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Horm Metab Res. 2003 Jan;35(1):13-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38385.

Abstract

Some techniques for the evaluation of insulin resistance (IR), such as the clamp technique, are not viable for the study of large populations; and for this reason, alternative approaches based on fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and plasma insulin (FPI) have been proposed. The aim of this study was to compare the IR calculations obtained from FPI and FPG values with the insulin sensitivity (IS) index derived from the minimal model. Eighty-seven healthy subjects with a wide range of body mass index (18 - 44 kg x m -2) and 16 DM2 non-obese patients were included in the study. All of the patients underwent a frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGTT), and the minimal model of glucose was used for the estimation of insulin sensitivity (IS MINIMAL ). The HOMA-IR index, the Avignon index, and the quotient FPG/FPI were used to calculate basal steady-state IR. The basal IR value that best correlated with IS was Log (1/HOMA-IR) (r = 0.70, p < 0.001). All of the basal indices showed a high correlation with each other. In conclusions, insulin sensitivity indices as determined from the basal glycaemia and insulinemia values are not good estimators for metabolic reality from the perspective of the minimal model. Nevertheless, they might well have an IR screening value for epidemiological studies, as long as there is no pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction.

摘要

一些评估胰岛素抵抗(IR)的技术,如钳夹技术,并不适用于大规模人群的研究;因此,有人提出了基于空腹血糖(FPG)和血浆胰岛素(FPI)的替代方法。本研究的目的是比较从FPI和FPG值获得的IR计算结果与从最小模型得出的胰岛素敏感性(IS)指数。87名体重指数范围较广(18 - 44 kg·m⁻²)的健康受试者和16名2型糖尿病非肥胖患者纳入了本研究。所有患者均接受了频繁采样的静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(FSIGTT),并使用葡萄糖最小模型来估计胰岛素敏感性(IS MINIMAL)。采用稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)指数、阿维尼翁指数以及FPG/FPI比值来计算基础稳态IR。与IS相关性最好的基础IR值为Log(1/HOMA-IR)(r = 0.70,p < 0.001)。所有基础指标之间均显示出高度相关性。总之,从基础血糖和胰岛素水平值确定的胰岛素敏感性指数,从最小模型的角度来看,并非代谢实际情况的良好估计指标。然而,只要不存在胰岛β细胞功能障碍,它们很可能对流行病学研究具有IR筛查价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验