Aloulou Ikram, Brun Jean-Frederic, Mercier Jacques
Metabolic Unit, Service Central de Physiologie Clinique, Centre d'Exploration et de Réadaptation des Anomalies du Métabolisme Musculaire (CERAMM), CHU Lapeyronie, 34295 Montpellier cedex 5, France.
Metabolism. 2006 May;55(5):676-90. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2006.01.002.
There is a need for reliable measurements of insulin sensitivity (SI) simpler than the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp or the intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT), which could be used when the simpler surrogates based on fasting insulin (Ib) and glucose (Gb) lose their validity. Several evaluations of SI derived from oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or its physiologic form, the standardized breakfast test (SBT), have been proposed. We aimed at determining which SBT-derived measurements of SI give the best prediction of the values obtained with the minimal model analysis of an IVGTT. Twenty-eight subjects (23 females and 5 males; age, 44.3+/-0.6 years) with a wide range of glucose tolerance randomly underwent a hyperglucidic SBT and an IVGTT with minimal model analysis. Correlations of 35 indices (converted if appropriated into similar units) with IVGTT-derived SI were calculated, and the accuracy of the empiric formulas obtained with the 11 best predictions were evaluated with Bland-Altman plots. Subjects covered all the spectrum of SI between 0.19 and 21.3 min-1/(microU.mL-1)x10(-4). Eight procedures yielded satisfactory predictions of minimal model SI: (1) SI (from Matsuda's composite index)=-1.24+65/(IbGbImGm)-0.5; (2) SI=1.89+2690/(IbGbImGm); (3) SI (from Bennett's index)=-2.93+5.16/(log Ibxlog Gb); (4) SI (from Sluiter's index)=0.2+2400/(IpGp); (5) SI=-8.54+38.4/(Belfiore's ISI index); (6) SI (from Cederholm's formula)=76/(Gm log Im); (7) SI=0.248+0.947/GbIm; (8) SI (from Mari's "oral glucose insulin sensitivity" index)=oral glucose insulin sensitivity/Ip; (9) Caumo's model. Glucose effectiveness Sg can also be accurately predicted by the following formula: Sg=2.921e-0.185(G60- Gb) (Ip=insulin peak; Gp=glucose peak; Ia=insulin area; Ga=glucose area; G60=glycemia at 60 minutes). The hyperglucidic SBT can provide accurate evaluations of SI and Sg, either by elaborated models or by simple empiric formulas.
需要有比正常血糖高胰岛素钳夹试验或静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)更简单的可靠胰岛素敏感性(SI)测量方法,当基于空腹胰岛素(Ib)和葡萄糖(Gb)的更简单替代指标失去有效性时可以使用。已经有人提出了几种对源自口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)或其生理形式即标准化早餐试验(SBT)的SI进行评估的方法。我们旨在确定哪些源自SBT的SI测量方法能够对通过IVGTT最小模型分析获得的值做出最佳预测。28名受试者(23名女性和5名男性;年龄44.3±0.6岁),其糖耐量范围广泛,随机接受了高糖SBT和带有最小模型分析的IVGTT。计算了35个指标(如合适则转换为相似单位)与源自IVGTT的SI之间的相关性,并使用Bland-Altman图评估了由11个最佳预测得出的经验公式的准确性。受试者涵盖了SI在0.19至21.3 min-1/(μU·mL-1)×10(-4)之间的所有范围。八种方法对最小模型SI做出了令人满意的预测:(1)SI(源自松田综合指数)=-1.24 + 65/(IbGbImGm)-0.5;(2)SI = 1.89 + 2690/(IbGbImGm);(3)SI(源自贝内特指数)=-2.93 + 5.16/(log Ibxlog Gb);(4)SI(源自斯卢伊特指数)= 0.2 + 2400/(IpGp);(5)SI = -8.54 + 38.4/(贝尔菲奥雷ISI指数);(6)SI(源自塞德霍尔姆公式)= 76/(Gm log Im);(7)SI = 0.248 + 0.947/GbIm;(8)SI(源自马里的“口服葡萄糖胰岛素敏感性”指数)=口服葡萄糖胰岛素敏感性/Ip;(9)考莫模型。葡萄糖效能Sg也可以通过以下公式准确预测:Sg = 2.921e-0.185(G60 - Gb)(Ip = 胰岛素峰值;Gp = 葡萄糖峰值;Ia = 胰岛素面积;Ga = 葡萄糖面积;G60 = 60分钟时的血糖)。高糖SBT可以通过精细模型或简单的经验公式对SI和Sg进行准确评估。