Symbas P N, Harlaftis N, Waldo W J
Ann Surg. 1976 Apr;183(4):377-81. doi: 10.1097/00000658-197604000-00008.
The management of penetrating wounds of the heart has been controversial. During the last 10 years we have used 3 different therapeutic approaches for the treatment of these wounds and the obtained results comprise this report. From 1964 to 1974 we treated 102 patients, four of whom expired immediately after their arrival to the clinic. The remaining 98 patients were divided into five groups according to their clinical presentation and treatment. Group I, 17 patients (14 with stab and 3 with bullet wound) seen with cardiac tamponade from 1964 to 1967 were treated first with pericardiocentesis and then were operated upon if pericardiocentesis yielded no results or if cardiac tamponade recurred. Fourteen patients recovered and three died, with an overall mortality of 17.5% Group II, 34 patients (23 with stab and 11 with bullet wound) were seen with cardiac tamponade from 1968 to 1971. The patients with stab wound were managed the same as group I patients and those with bullet wound were operated upon immediately. Twenty-nine recovered and 5 died, with an overall mortality of 14.7%. Group III, 20 patients (12 with stab and 8 with bullet wound) were seen with cardiac tamponade from 1972 to 1974. All of them were operated upon immediately and pericardiocentesis was used in this group only to provide time for a safe operation. Nineteen recovered and one died, with an overall mortality of 5%. Group IV, 20 patients (5 with stab and 15 with bullet wound) with massive bleeding, were operated upon immediately. Ten (4 out of the 5 with stab and 6 out of the 15 with bullet wound) recovered, with a mortality rate of 50%. Group V, seven patients were seen throughout the study period without bleeding or cardiac tamponade. Some of them were operated upon electively and others are being followed and all have done well. This study suggests (1) that patients with penetrating wound of the heart and cardiac tamponade or bleeding will derive better results if they are operated upon as soon as possible and if pericardiocentesis is used to provide time for a safe operation and (2) that those with other manifestations should be evaluated and if their lesion is significant, they should be operated upon electively.
心脏穿透伤的处理一直存在争议。在过去10年里,我们采用了3种不同的治疗方法来处理这些伤口,本报告包含了所取得的结果。1964年至1974年,我们共治疗了102例患者,其中4例在抵达诊所后立即死亡。其余98例患者根据其临床表现和治疗方法分为五组。第一组,1964年至1967年期间,17例患者(14例刺伤和3例枪伤)出现心脏压塞,首先进行心包穿刺术,若心包穿刺术无效或心脏压塞复发,则进行手术。14例患者康复,3例死亡,总死亡率为17.5%。第二组,1968年至1971年期间,34例患者(23例刺伤和11例枪伤)出现心脏压塞。刺伤患者的处理方式与第一组患者相同,枪伤患者立即进行手术。29例康复,5例死亡,总死亡率为14.7%。第三组,1972年至1974年期间,20例患者(12例刺伤和8例枪伤)出现心脏压塞。所有患者均立即进行手术,该组仅使用心包穿刺术为安全手术争取时间。19例康复,1例死亡,总死亡率为5%。第四组,20例大量出血的患者(5例刺伤和15例枪伤)立即进行手术。10例(5例刺伤患者中的4例和15例枪伤患者中的6例)康复,死亡率为50%。第五组,在整个研究期间,7例患者未出现出血或心脏压塞。其中一些患者接受了择期手术,另一些患者正在接受随访,所有患者情况良好。本研究表明:(1)心脏穿透伤合并心脏压塞或出血的患者,如果尽快进行手术,并用心包穿刺术为安全手术争取时间,会取得更好的结果;(2)有其他表现的患者应进行评估,如果其损伤严重,应进行择期手术。