Rutkowski Jacqueline S, Crewther David P, Crewther Sheila G
Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia.
J Vis. 2003;3(1):95-105. doi: 10.1167/3.1.10.
The severe deficits in rapid automatized naming demonstrated by children with developmental dyslexia has usually been interpreted in terms of a deficit in speed of access to the lexicon rather than as a possible deficit in speed of visual object recognition. Yet fluent reading requires rapid visual recognition and semantic interpretation of new letters and words appearing in successive fixations of the eyes. Thus we wondered whether change detection performance was related to reading ability. We investigated whether children with developmental dyslexia (DD) were less able to detect change in a simple display--gap--display paradigm than normal reading (NR) children of the same age and children with impaired reading and mentation (LD). In a first experimental phase, the DDs required a longer initial exposure of four letter items in order to detect change of a single letter at a level of 71% correct, compared with NRs performing at the same level. Thus the deficit in reading in DD is associated with a deficit in early processes associated with visual recognition. In a second experimental phase (using the individual target display exposures measured in the first phase), cues appeared during the 250 ms gap for a period of either 0 (no cue), 50 or 200 ms immediately prior to the presentation of the second (comparison) display. Children of all groups showed dependence on the presence of the cue to help make a judgement of change (versus no change), with the NRs least affected. When change was detected in the presence of a cue, the NRs were better able to identify the new letter than either of the other groups. However, only about 50% of the correct detections were accompanied by a correct identification. Despite published reports of a mini-neglect for left visual field in dyslexic adults, none of our groups showed such an effect. However, a significant upper visual field (UpVF) advantage in change detection performance was found across groups, which we interpret in terms of the interactions of the ventral and dorsal streams.
发育性阅读障碍儿童在快速自动命名方面存在的严重缺陷,通常被解释为词汇检索速度不足,而非视觉物体识别速度可能存在缺陷。然而,流畅阅读需要对眼睛连续注视中出现的新字母和单词进行快速视觉识别和语义解读。因此,我们想知道变化检测表现是否与阅读能力有关。我们研究了发育性阅读障碍(DD)儿童在简单的呈现-间隔-呈现范式中检测变化的能力是否低于同龄正常阅读(NR)儿童以及阅读和心理功能受损(LD)的儿童。在第一个实验阶段,与达到相同正确水平的NR儿童相比,DD儿童为了在71%的正确水平上检测单个字母的变化,需要对四个字母项目进行更长时间的初始曝光。因此,DD儿童的阅读缺陷与视觉识别相关的早期过程缺陷有关。在第二个实验阶段(使用在第一阶段测量的个体目标呈现曝光时间),在第二个(比较)呈现之前的250毫秒间隔期间,提示会出现0(无提示)、50或200毫秒。所有组的儿童都表现出依赖提示的存在来帮助判断变化(与无变化相比),其中NR儿童受影响最小。当在有提示的情况下检测到变化时,NR儿童比其他两组更能识别新字母。然而,只有约50%的正确检测伴随着正确识别。尽管有关于成年阅读障碍者左视野存在轻微忽视的报道,但我们的任何一组都未表现出这种效应。然而,我们发现所有组在变化检测表现上都存在显著的上视野(UpVF)优势,我们从腹侧和背侧流的相互作用方面对此进行了解释。