Suppr超能文献

成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征的高频振荡通气

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adult patients.

作者信息

Derdak Stephen

机构信息

Wilford Hall Medical Center, Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Lackland Air Force Base, TX, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4 Suppl):S317-23. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057910.50618.EB.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) using an open-lung strategy has been demonstrated to improve oxygenation in neonatal and pediatric respiratory failure, without increasing barotrauma. Animal studies using small (<4 mm) endotracheal tubes have shown reduced histopathologic evidence of lung injury and inflammatory mediator release, suggesting reduced ventilator-induced lung injury.

CLINICAL STUDIES

During the last decade, case reports and observational studies of HFOV in patients failing conventional ventilation strategies have suggested improved oxygenation in adult patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. These reports have also suggested that early (2 days) initiation of HFOV is more likely to result in survival than delayed initiation (>7 days). A recently published randomized, controlled trial in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (n = 148) comparing HFOV with a pressure-control ventilation strategy (Pao(2)/Fio(2) ratio of <or=200 mm Hg on positive end-expiratory pressure of >10 cm H(2)O) demonstrated early (<16 hrs) improvement in Pao(2)/Fio(2) (p =.008) in the HFOV group but no significant difference in oxygenation index between the two groups during the initial 72 hrs of treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 37% in the HFOV group and 52% in the conventional ventilation group (p =.102). There was no significant difference between treatment groups in the prevalence of barotrauma, hemodynamic instability, or mucus plugging. This study suggests that HFOV is as effective and safe as the conventional strategy to which it was compared.

CLINICAL APPLICATION

For clinical use in adults, a trial of HFOV may be considered when Fio(2) requirements exceed 60% and mean airway pressure is approaching 20 cm H(2)O or higher (or, alternatively, positive end-expiratory pressure of >15 cm H(2)O). It is currently unknown whether initiating HFOV at a lower severity threshold would result in reduced ventilator-associated lung injury or mortality.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Future studies should compare different algorithms of applying HFOV to determine the optimal techniques for achieving oxygenation and ventilation, while minimizing ventilator-associated lung injury. The potential role of adjunctive therapies used with HFOV (e.g., prone ventilation, inhaled nitric oxide, aerosolized vasodilators, liquid ventilation) will require further research.

摘要

引言

采用肺开放策略的高频振荡通气(HFOV)已被证明可改善新生儿和小儿呼吸衰竭患者的氧合,且不会增加气压伤。使用小口径(<4mm)气管内导管的动物研究显示,肺损伤的组织病理学证据及炎症介质释放减少,提示呼吸机所致肺损伤减轻。

临床研究

在过去十年中,针对常规通气策略治疗失败患者应用HFOV的病例报告和观察性研究表明,重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征成年患者的氧合得到改善。这些报告还表明,早期(2天内)开始使用HFOV比延迟使用(>7天)更有可能实现存活。最近一项针对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者(n = 148)的随机对照试验,比较了HFOV与压力控制通气策略(呼气末正压>10 cm H₂O时,动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度比值≤200 mmHg),结果显示HFOV组的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度在早期(<16小时)有所改善(p = 0.008),但在治疗的最初72小时内,两组的氧合指数无显著差异。HFOV组的30天死亡率为37%,传统通气组为52%(p = 0.102)。在气压伤、血流动力学不稳定或黏液堵塞的发生率方面,治疗组之间无显著差异。该研究表明,HFOV与所比较的传统策略一样有效且安全。

临床应用

对于成年患者的临床应用,当吸入氧浓度需求超过60%且平均气道压接近20 cm H₂O或更高(或者呼气末正压>15 cm H₂O)时,可考虑尝试使用HFOV。目前尚不清楚在较低严重程度阈值时开始使用HFOV是否会降低呼吸机相关性肺损伤或死亡率。

未来方向

未来的研究应比较应用HFOV的不同算法,以确定实现氧合和通气的最佳技术,同时将呼吸机相关性肺损伤降至最低。与HFOV联合使用的辅助治疗(如俯卧位通气、吸入一氧化氮、雾化血管扩张剂、液体通气)的潜在作用需要进一步研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验