Ligon Lee A, Shelly Spencer S, Tokito Mariko, Holzbaur Erika L F
Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6085, USA.
Mol Biol Cell. 2003 Apr;14(4):1405-17. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e02-03-0155.
Several microtubule-binding proteins including EB1, dynactin, APC, and CLIP-170 localize to the plus-ends of growing microtubules. Although these proteins can bind to microtubules independently, evidence for interactions among them has led to the hypothesis of a plus-end complex. Here we clarify the interaction between EB1 and dynactin and show that EB1 binds directly to the N-terminus of the p150(Glued) subunit. One function of a plus-end complex may be to regulate microtubule dynamics. Overexpression of either EB1 or p150(Glued) in cultured cells bundles microtubules, suggesting that each may enhance microtubule stability. The morphology of these bundles, however, differs dramatically, indicating that EB1 and dynactin may act in different ways. Disruption of the dynactin complex augments the bundling effect of EB1, suggesting that dynactin may regulate the effect of EB1 on microtubules. In vitro assays were performed to elucidate the effects of EB1 and p150(Glued) on microtubule polymerization, and they show that p150(Glued) has a potent microtubule nucleation effect, whereas EB1 has a potent elongation effect. Overall microtubule dynamics may result from a balance between the individual effects of plus-end proteins. Differences in the expression and regulation of plus-end proteins in different cell types may underlie previously noted differences in microtubule dynamics.
包括EB1、动力蛋白激活蛋白、腺瘤性息肉病蛋白(APC)和CLIP-170在内的几种微管结合蛋白定位于正在生长的微管的正端。尽管这些蛋白可独立与微管结合,但它们之间相互作用的证据催生了正端复合体假说。在此,我们阐明了EB1与动力蛋白激活蛋白之间的相互作用,并表明EB1直接结合于p150(Glued)亚基的N端。正端复合体的一个功能可能是调节微管动力学。在培养细胞中过表达EB1或p150(Glued)会使微管成束,这表明二者均可增强微管稳定性。然而,这些微管束的形态差异显著,这表明EB1和动力蛋白激活蛋白可能以不同方式发挥作用。破坏动力蛋白激活蛋白复合体可增强EB1的成束效应,这表明动力蛋白激活蛋白可能调节EB1对微管的作用。我们进行了体外试验以阐明EB1和p150(Glued)对微管聚合的影响,结果表明p150(Glued)具有强大的微管成核作用,而EB1具有强大的延长作用。微管的整体动力学可能源于正端蛋白各自作用之间的平衡。不同细胞类型中正端蛋白表达和调控的差异可能是先前注意到的微管动力学差异的基础。