Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.
作者信息
Campbell S M, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M N
机构信息
National Primary Care Research and Development Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL.
出版信息
BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):816-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.816.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.在初级保健中制定和应用质量指标所使用的研究方法。
BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):816-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.816.
2
Quality indicators for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease in primary care in nine European countries.九个欧洲国家基层医疗中心血管疾病预防与管理的质量指标
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct;15(5):509-15. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328302f44d.
3
Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.在初级保健中制定和应用质量指标所使用的研究方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):358-64. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.358.
4
Development of performance indicators for the primary care management of pediatric epilepsy: expert consensus recommendations based on the available evidence.儿童癫痫初级保健管理绩效指标的制定：基于现有证据的专家共识建议
Epilepsia. 2006 Dec;47(12):2011-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00853.x.
5
Panning for gold: an evidence-based tool for assessment of performance indicators in primary health care.淘金：一种基于证据的基层医疗绩效指标评估工具。
Health Policy. 2007 Feb;80(2):314-27. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 May 5.
6
[AQUIK®: starter set of ambulatory quality indicators developed by the German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians].[AQUIK®：德国法定医疗保险医师全国协会制定的门诊质量指标起始集]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
7
What makes a good performance indicator? Devising primary care performance indicators for New Zealand.什么是好的绩效指标？为新西兰设计初级保健绩效指标。
N Z Med J. 2004 Apr 2;117(1191):U820.
8
[Towards evidence-based quality improvement].迈向基于证据的质量改进
Ugeskr Laeger. 2010 Mar 8;172(10):790-4.
9
Developing primary care review criteria from evidence-based guidelines: coronary heart disease as a model.基于循证指南制定初级保健评估标准：以冠心病为例
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Sep;53(494):690-6.
10
[Clinical guidelines and health services research].
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2011 May;136(19):1021-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275837. Epub 2011 May 3.
引用本文的文献
1
Acceptability of Components for a Mandatory Quality Improvement Framework: A Survey Among Swiss General Practitioners.强制性质量改进框架各组成部分的可接受性：瑞士全科医生调查
Health Serv Insights. 2025 Jun 21;18:11786329251346828. doi: 10.1177/11786329251346828. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of provider feedback on quality improvement in rehabilitation services: an interrupted time series analysis.提供者反馈对康复服务质量改进的影响：一项中断时间序列分析
Front Rehabil Sci. 2025 Mar 6;6:1564346. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2025.1564346. eCollection 2025.
3
The feasibility of antimicrobial lead time as process and quality indicator for hospitals.抗菌药物提前期作为医院流程和质量指标的可行性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 May;44(5):1177-1183. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05085-w. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
4
Using a modified Delphi procedure to select a PRO-CTCAE-based subset for patient-reported symptomatic toxicity monitoring in rectal cancer patients.采用改良 Delphi 程序选择基于 PRO-CTCAE 的子集，用于监测直肠癌患者的患者报告症状毒性。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3013-3026. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03767-0. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
5
Identifying cost-based quality and performance indicators for home care: a modified delphi method study.确定家庭护理的基于成本的质量和绩效指标：一项修正后的德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11299-z.
6
The ballistic articular structure injury classification (BASIC) system: clarifying ballistic articular injuries.弹道关节结构损伤分类（BASIC）系统：阐明弹道关节损伤。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Aug;34(6):3181-3191. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-04049-8. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
A comprehensive assessment of quality management methods in the SMESH study.SMESH 研究中质量管理方法的综合评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 20;24(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11055-3.
8
Perioperative patient safety indicators-A Delphi study.围手术期患者安全指标——一项德尔菲研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Apr;34(4):1351-1363. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17212. Epub 2024 May 17.
9
Key performance indicators for pharmaceutical services: A systematic review.药学服务的关键绩效指标：一项系统综述。
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Apr 10;14:100441. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100441. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Quality indicators for ambulatory colectomy: literature search and expert consensus.门诊结肠切除术的质量指标：文献检索和专家共识。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):1894-1901. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10660-3. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
本文引用的文献
1
Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes.基层医疗中三种常见病症的质量评估：专家小组制定的心绞痛、哮喘和2型糖尿病审查标准的有效性和可靠性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):125-30. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.125.
2
Expert consensus on the desirable characteristics of review criteria for improvement of health care quality.关于改善医疗质量的评审标准理想特征的专家共识。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):173-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100173...
3
Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand.对英国、澳大利亚和新西兰全科医疗临床护理质量研究的系统评价。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):152-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100152...
4
Improving the quality of health care in the United Kingdom and the United States: a framework for change.提高英国和美国的医疗保健质量：变革框架
Milbank Q. 2001;79(2):281-315. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00206.
5
Clinical governance in primary care: participating in clinical governance.初级保健中的临床治理：参与临床治理。
BMJ. 2000 Sep 23;321(7263):737-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.737.
6
Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers.定义与衡量医疗质量：美国研究人员的视角
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Aug;12(4):281-95. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.4.281.
7
Consensus development methods: a review of best practice in creating clinical guidelines.共识发展方法：创建临床指南的最佳实践综述
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999 Oct;4(4):236-48. doi: 10.1177/135581969900400410.
8
Development of review criteria for assessing the quality of management of stable angina, adult asthma, and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in general practice.制定评估全科医疗中稳定性心绞痛、成人哮喘和非胰岛素依赖型糖尿病管理质量的评审标准。
Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):6-15. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.6.
9
A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.一种用于详细评估医疗技术适宜性的方法。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;2(1):53-63. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300002774.
10
Performance indicators for primary care groups: an evidence based approach.基层医疗集团的绩效指标：基于证据的方法。
BMJ. 1998 Nov 14;317(7169):1354-60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7169.1354.
Zotero 插件