Meiers Jonathan C, Kazemi Reza B, Donadio Marco
Department of Prosthodontics and Operative Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Farmington, Conn 06030-1370, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 Apr;89(4):388-93. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2003.87.
Fiber-reinforced composites (FRC) are used in direct intra-oral applications as periodontal splints and chairside tooth replacement by bonding them to etched enamel with resin adhesives and composites. There is little information regarding the effect of FRC on the shear bond strength of composite to etched enamel.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of resin preimpregnated and non-preimpregnated fiber-reinforced composites on enamel to composite shear bond strength (SBS).
Specimen groups (n = 12) consisted of a control (composite with no fiber reinforcement), Ribbond, Splint-It Unidirectional, Splint-It Woven, and Connect, which were bonded to 37% phosphoric acid etched Prime and Bond NT adhesive-treated bovine enamel surfaces on a bed of Tetric Flow composite. Specimens were thermocycled 1000 times between 5 degrees and 55 degrees C and loaded on a universal testing machine in shear at a linear increasing load until fracture (MPa). The fractured surfaces of the debonded specimens were evaluated to determine the nature of the fracture with a light binocular microscope (x10). Shear bond strength data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student-Newman-Kuels tests (P <.05).
Mean MPa +/- SD for the test groups were as follows: Control, 15.6 +/- 2.4; Splint-It Unidirectional, 15.3 +/- 2.4; Splint-It Woven, 16.5 +/- 1.8; Connect, 18.8 +/- 1.5; and Ribbond, 15.8 +/- 2.2. The Connect FRC group had significantly higher (P <0.05) enamel SBS than all other groups. Fracture analysis showed varying types of failures among the groups, with cohesive fractures within the fiber reinforcement of Splint-It Unidirectional and Connect, cohesive fractures within the bonding resin/flowable composite for Ribbond and the control, and adhesive fracture at the fiber reinforcement interface with Splint-It Woven.
Within the limitations of this study, no differences in SBS were observed with the addition of 3 of the 4 FRCs compared to composite without FRC, with the exception of the Connect product which provided significantly higher SBS values.
纤维增强复合材料(FRC)通过用树脂粘合剂和复合材料将其粘结到酸蚀釉质上,被用于口腔内直接应用,如牙周夹板和椅旁牙齿修复。关于FRC对复合材料与酸蚀釉质之间剪切粘结强度的影响,相关信息较少。
本研究的目的是检验树脂预浸和非预浸纤维增强复合材料对釉质与复合材料剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。
样本组(n = 12)包括一个对照组(无纤维增强的复合材料)、Ribbond、Splint-It单向、Splint-It编织和Connect,它们被粘结到在Tetric Flow复合材料层上经37%磷酸酸蚀并经Prime and Bond NT粘合剂处理的牛牙釉质表面。样本在5摄氏度至55摄氏度之间进行1000次热循环,然后在万能试验机上以线性增加的载荷进行剪切加载直至断裂(MPa)。用光学双目显微镜(×10)评估脱粘样本的断裂表面,以确定断裂的性质。剪切粘结强度数据进行方差分析(ANOVA)和Student-Newman-Kuels检验(P <.05)。
各测试组的平均MPa ± SD如下:对照组,15.6 ± 2.4;Splint-It单向,15.3 ± 2.4;Splint-It编织,16.5 ± 1.8;Connect,18.8 ± 1.5;Ribbond,15.8 ± 2.2。Connect FRC组的釉质SBS显著高于(P <0.05)所有其他组。断裂分析表明,各组之间存在不同类型的失效,Splint-It单向和Connect的纤维增强材料内部出现内聚性断裂,Ribbond和对照组的粘结树脂/可流动复合材料内部出现内聚性断裂,Splint-It编织在纤维增强材料界面处出现粘结性断裂。
在本研究的局限性范围内,与无FRC的复合材料相比,4种FRC中的3种添加后,SBS没有差异,但Connect产品的SBS值显著更高。