Suppr超能文献

英国的药品监管

Drug regulation in the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Dollery C T

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1976 May;19(5 Pt 2):689-93. doi: 10.1002/cpt1976195part2689.

Abstract

The British system under the Medicines Act by which new drug applications are evaluated is described in a step-by-step manner from submission of application to the issuance of a clinical trial certificate by the licensing authority. At the end of a period by clinical trials the submission is brought back for a product license. Once a drug is marketed it falls within the purview of the adverse reaction monitoring group of the Committee on Safety of Medicines (CSM). A recent innovation is "monitored release", by which, for a period of time after marketing, case reports are submitted by the pharmaceutical company to the CSM. The advantages of the British system are: (1) the final licensing decisions being made by the academic members of the Committee means that they are insulated from commercial and political pressures, and are additionally reached without undue delay; (2) academic members are not permitted to be retained as consultants to the industry on a long-term basis; (3) evaluation solely on British studies is not obligatory--foreign studies are also acceptable. Weakness in the system are: (1) recruitment of people experienced in pharmacology and therapeutics is difficult; (2) there is an inordinate work load on the academic members of the Main Committee and Subcommittees. Importance of an effective monitoring in the postmarketing stage is emphasized, because the long-term judgement must necessarily be based on wide experience in the field. The multiplication of the same of similar drugs is deplored, and innovative efforts in the quest for new drugs, especially for rare diseases, are to be encouraged.

摘要

《药品法》规定的英国新药评估体系,从申请提交到许可机构颁发临床试验证书,都进行了详细的分步描述。临床试验阶段结束后,申请将被送回以获取产品许可证。一旦药品上市,它就属于药品安全委员会(CSM)不良反应监测小组的监管范围。最近的一项创新是“监测性放行”,即药品上市后的一段时间内,制药公司要向CSM提交病例报告。英国体系的优点包括:(1)委员会的学术成员做出最终许可决定,这意味着他们不受商业和政治压力影响,且能及时做出决定;(2)学术成员不允许长期受聘为行业顾问;(3)不强制仅依据英国的研究进行评估,国外研究也可接受。该体系的缺点有:(1)难以招募到有药理学和治疗学经验的人员;(2)主要委员会和小组委员会的学术成员工作负担过重。强调了上市后阶段有效监测的重要性,因为长期判断必然要基于该领域的广泛经验。对相同或类似药物的增多表示遗憾,鼓励在新药研发,尤其是针对罕见病的新药研发方面做出创新努力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验