Wong Glenn C, Berman Barbara A, Hoang Tuyen, Bernaards Coen, Jones Craig, Bernert J Thomas
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-6900, USA.
Arch Environ Health. 2002 Nov-Dec;57(6):584-90. doi: 10.1080/00039890209602092.
The authors examined the relationship between parent-reported estimates of children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) in the home and children's urinary cotinine levels. Data were collected from a largely ethnic minority, low-income, urban sample of households in which a child had asthma and at least 1 household member smoked. Information about level of household smoking restriction, parental smoking status, and number of cigarettes smoked per day accounted for approximately 45% of the variance in cotinine concentration. Detailed information about the duration of household smoking or children's ETS exposure added no additional significant information. Questionnaires eliciting detailed information about smoking habits and children's ETS exposure may be no better at predicting children's urinary cotinine levels than simpler surveys that inquire about smoking restrictions in the home, parental smoking status, and number of cigarettes smoked at home per day.
作者研究了家长报告的儿童在家中接触环境烟草烟雾(ETS)的估计值与儿童尿中可替宁水平之间的关系。数据收集自一个主要为少数民族、低收入的城市家庭样本,这些家庭中有儿童患有哮喘且至少有一名家庭成员吸烟。关于家庭吸烟限制水平、父母吸烟状况以及每天吸烟数量的信息约占可替宁浓度方差的45%。关于家庭吸烟持续时间或儿童ETS暴露的详细信息并未增加额外的显著信息。与询问家中吸烟限制、父母吸烟状况以及每天在家中吸烟数量的更简单调查相比,引发关于吸烟习惯和儿童ETS暴露详细信息的问卷在预测儿童尿中可替宁水平方面可能并无优势。