• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉搭桥术后使用团注热稀释法、连续热稀释法和全身阻抗心动图法测量心输出量。

Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.

作者信息

Kaukinen Seppo, Kööbi Tiit, Bi YanBin, Turjanmaa Väinö M h

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Apr;17(2):199-203. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2003.47.

DOI:10.1053/jcan.2003.47
PMID:12698402
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility of continuous cardiac output (CO) monitoring with whole-body impedance cardiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and to compare the values obtained with those measured using the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.

INTERVENTIONS

CO was measured intermittently using the bolus thermodilution method, and continuously using the continuous thermodilution method, and whole-body impedance cardiography immediately after transfer to the intensive care unit.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Bolus thermodilution CO was measured in triplicate at up to 14 time points overnight. Continuous thermodilution CO and whole-body impedance cardiography CO values were recorded simultaneously. During the study period, the bias in CO values between bolus thermodilution and whole-body impedance cardiography ranged from 0.07 to 1.05 L/min and the precision (standard deviation of differences) ranged from 0.82 to 1.31 L/min. The bias between the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods ranged from 0.06 to 0.58 L/min and the precision from 0.43 to 1.02 L/min. Pulmonary artery temperature and CO level were the major determinants of the bias and precision in both comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between whole-body impedance cardiography and bolus thermodilution is slightly inferior to that between the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods but not to the extent that it hampers the use of whole-body impedance cardiography for the continuous monitoring of CO after coronary artery bypass surgery.

摘要

目的

测试冠状动脉旁路移植术后采用全身阻抗心动图连续监测心输出量(CO)的可行性,并将所得值与采用团注法和连续热稀释法测量的值进行比较。

设计

一项前瞻性研究。

地点

一所大学医院的重症监护病房。

患者

20例冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者。

干预措施

转至重症监护病房后,立即采用团注热稀释法间歇测量CO,采用连续热稀释法连续测量CO,并采用全身阻抗心动图测量CO。

测量指标及主要结果

在夜间多达14个时间点对团注热稀释法测得的CO进行三次测量。同时记录连续热稀释法测得的CO值和全身阻抗心动图测得的CO值。在研究期间,团注热稀释法与全身阻抗心动图法测得的CO值偏差范围为0.07至1.05L/分钟,精密度(差值标准差)范围为0.82至1.31L/分钟。团注法与连续热稀释法之间的偏差范围为0.06至0.58L/分钟,精密度范围为0.43至1.02L/分钟。在两种比较中,肺动脉温度和CO水平是偏差和精密度的主要决定因素。

结论

全身阻抗心动图与团注热稀释法之间的一致性略逊于团注法与连续热稀释法之间的一致性,但并不妨碍在冠状动脉搭桥术后使用全身阻抗心动图连续监测CO。

相似文献

1
Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.冠状动脉搭桥术后使用团注热稀释法、连续热稀释法和全身阻抗心动图法测量心输出量。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Apr;17(2):199-203. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2003.47.
2
Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后患者连续心输出量测量的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Apr;17(2):211-6. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2003.49.
3
Cardiac output can be reliably measured noninvasively after coronary artery bypass grafting operation.冠状动脉搭桥手术后,心输出量可以通过无创方式可靠地测量。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Oct;27(10):2206-11. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199910000-00023.
4
Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.从经气管测量的阻抗心输出量测定心输出量:经气管心输出量监测器的临床评估。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011 Oct;25(5):770-5. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2010.12.017. Epub 2011 Feb 26.
5
[Comparison between continuous and intermittent thermodilution measurement of cardiac output during coronary artery bypass operation].[冠状动脉搭桥手术期间心输出量连续与间断热稀释测量的比较]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1997 Apr;32(4):226-33. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995042.
6
Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中FloTrac心输出量监测系统与肺动脉心输出量测量的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2007 Oct;24(10):832-9. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507001056. Epub 2007 Aug 1.
7
Cardiac output measurements with electrical velocimetry in patients undergoing CABG surgery: a comparison with intermittent thermodilution.冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术患者中采用电测速法测量心输出量:与间歇性热稀释法的比较
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Mar;25(3):237-42. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507002669. Epub 2007 Sep 13.
8
Continuous measurement of cardiac output by inert gas throughflow: comparison with thermodilution.通过惰性气体通流连续测量心输出量:与热稀释法的比较。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Apr;17(2):204-10. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2003.48.
9
[Cardiac output monitoring by impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery].[心脏手术中通过阻抗心动图监测心输出量]
Masui. 1990 Apr;39(4):508-12.
10
[Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].[吲哚菁绿胸腔生物阻抗心输出量监测系统在心脏手术患者中与肺动脉心输出量测量的比较]
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2009 Jun;28(6):537-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2009.04.010. Epub 2009 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Invasive Measurement of Hemodynamic Parameters via Whole-Body Impedance Cardiography Among Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients: An Effective Alternative to Invasive Right Heart Catheterization?通过全身阻抗心动图对住院心力衰竭患者进行血流动力学参数的无创测量:侵入性右心导管检查的有效替代方法?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 Apr 2;12(4):128. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12040128.
2
Bioimpedance based determination of cardiac index does not show enough trueness for point of care use in patients with systolic heart failure.基于生物阻抗的心脏指数测定在收缩性心力衰竭患者的即时护理使用中不够准确。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Oct;37(5):1229-1237. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-00987-6. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
Monitoring in the intensive care.
重症监护中的监测
Crit Care Res Pract. 2012;2012:473507. doi: 10.1155/2012/473507. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
4
The impact of pulmonary disease on noninvasive measurement of cardiac output by the inert gas rebreathing method.肺部疾病对惰性气体重复呼吸法无创心输出量测量的影响。
Lung. 2010 Oct;188(5):433-40. doi: 10.1007/s00408-010-9257-0. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
5
A novel noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.一种新型无创超声心输出量监测仪:与心脏磁共振的比较。
Clin Cardiol. 2010 Feb;33(2):E8-14. doi: 10.1002/clc.20612.
6
[Measurement of cardiac output].[心输出量的测量]
Anaesthesist. 2005 Nov;54(11):1135-51; quiz 1152-3. doi: 10.1007/s00101-005-0924-0.