Kaukinen Seppo, Kööbi Tiit, Bi YanBin, Turjanmaa Väinö M h
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Apr;17(2):199-203. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2003.47.
To test the feasibility of continuous cardiac output (CO) monitoring with whole-body impedance cardiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and to compare the values obtained with those measured using the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods.
A prospective study.
Intensive care unit in a university hospital.
Twenty patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.
CO was measured intermittently using the bolus thermodilution method, and continuously using the continuous thermodilution method, and whole-body impedance cardiography immediately after transfer to the intensive care unit.
Bolus thermodilution CO was measured in triplicate at up to 14 time points overnight. Continuous thermodilution CO and whole-body impedance cardiography CO values were recorded simultaneously. During the study period, the bias in CO values between bolus thermodilution and whole-body impedance cardiography ranged from 0.07 to 1.05 L/min and the precision (standard deviation of differences) ranged from 0.82 to 1.31 L/min. The bias between the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods ranged from 0.06 to 0.58 L/min and the precision from 0.43 to 1.02 L/min. Pulmonary artery temperature and CO level were the major determinants of the bias and precision in both comparisons.
Agreement between whole-body impedance cardiography and bolus thermodilution is slightly inferior to that between the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods but not to the extent that it hampers the use of whole-body impedance cardiography for the continuous monitoring of CO after coronary artery bypass surgery.
测试冠状动脉旁路移植术后采用全身阻抗心动图连续监测心输出量(CO)的可行性,并将所得值与采用团注法和连续热稀释法测量的值进行比较。
一项前瞻性研究。
一所大学医院的重症监护病房。
20例冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者。
转至重症监护病房后,立即采用团注热稀释法间歇测量CO,采用连续热稀释法连续测量CO,并采用全身阻抗心动图测量CO。
在夜间多达14个时间点对团注热稀释法测得的CO进行三次测量。同时记录连续热稀释法测得的CO值和全身阻抗心动图测得的CO值。在研究期间,团注热稀释法与全身阻抗心动图法测得的CO值偏差范围为0.07至1.05L/分钟,精密度(差值标准差)范围为0.82至1.31L/分钟。团注法与连续热稀释法之间的偏差范围为0.06至0.58L/分钟,精密度范围为0.43至1.02L/分钟。在两种比较中,肺动脉温度和CO水平是偏差和精密度的主要决定因素。
全身阻抗心动图与团注热稀释法之间的一致性略逊于团注法与连续热稀释法之间的一致性,但并不妨碍在冠状动脉搭桥术后使用全身阻抗心动图连续监测CO。