Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉搭桥术后使用团注热稀释法、连续热稀释法和全身阻抗心动图法测量心输出量。

Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.

作者信息

Kaukinen Seppo, Kööbi Tiit, Bi YanBin, Turjanmaa Väinö M h

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003 Apr;17(2):199-203. doi: 10.1053/jcan.2003.47.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the feasibility of continuous cardiac output (CO) monitoring with whole-body impedance cardiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and to compare the values obtained with those measured using the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

Intensive care unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.

INTERVENTIONS

CO was measured intermittently using the bolus thermodilution method, and continuously using the continuous thermodilution method, and whole-body impedance cardiography immediately after transfer to the intensive care unit.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Bolus thermodilution CO was measured in triplicate at up to 14 time points overnight. Continuous thermodilution CO and whole-body impedance cardiography CO values were recorded simultaneously. During the study period, the bias in CO values between bolus thermodilution and whole-body impedance cardiography ranged from 0.07 to 1.05 L/min and the precision (standard deviation of differences) ranged from 0.82 to 1.31 L/min. The bias between the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods ranged from 0.06 to 0.58 L/min and the precision from 0.43 to 1.02 L/min. Pulmonary artery temperature and CO level were the major determinants of the bias and precision in both comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Agreement between whole-body impedance cardiography and bolus thermodilution is slightly inferior to that between the bolus and continuous thermodilution methods but not to the extent that it hampers the use of whole-body impedance cardiography for the continuous monitoring of CO after coronary artery bypass surgery.

摘要

目的

测试冠状动脉旁路移植术后采用全身阻抗心动图连续监测心输出量(CO)的可行性,并将所得值与采用团注法和连续热稀释法测量的值进行比较。

设计

一项前瞻性研究。

地点

一所大学医院的重症监护病房。

患者

20例冠状动脉旁路移植术后患者。

干预措施

转至重症监护病房后,立即采用团注热稀释法间歇测量CO,采用连续热稀释法连续测量CO,并采用全身阻抗心动图测量CO。

测量指标及主要结果

在夜间多达14个时间点对团注热稀释法测得的CO进行三次测量。同时记录连续热稀释法测得的CO值和全身阻抗心动图测得的CO值。在研究期间,团注热稀释法与全身阻抗心动图法测得的CO值偏差范围为0.07至1.05L/分钟,精密度(差值标准差)范围为0.82至1.31L/分钟。团注法与连续热稀释法之间的偏差范围为0.06至0.58L/分钟,精密度范围为0.43至1.02L/分钟。在两种比较中,肺动脉温度和CO水平是偏差和精密度的主要决定因素。

结论

全身阻抗心动图与团注热稀释法之间的一致性略逊于团注法与连续热稀释法之间的一致性,但并不妨碍在冠状动脉搭桥术后使用全身阻抗心动图连续监测CO。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验