• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

From symptoms to causes: diversity effects in diagnostic reasoning.

作者信息

Kim Nancy S, Keil Frank C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8205, USA.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):155-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03196090.

DOI:10.3758/bf03196090
PMID:12699151
Abstract

A single causal agent can often give rise to a cascade of consequences that can be envisioned as a branching pathway in which symptoms are the terminal nodes. In three studies, we investigated whether reasoning about root causes on the basis of such symptoms would conform to a diversity effect analogous to that found in inductive reasoning about properties of hierarchically organized categories. A strong diversity effect was found both for reasoning about medical diseases that drew on existing background knowledge and for reasoning that did not. Specifically, the presence of a root cause was more likely to be induced when the symptoms present were further apart in the branching structure.

摘要

相似文献

1
From symptoms to causes: diversity effects in diagnostic reasoning.
Mem Cognit. 2003 Jan;31(1):155-65. doi: 10.3758/bf03196090.
2
The diversity effect in diagnostic reasoning.诊断推理中的多样性效应。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jul;44(5):789-805. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0592-0.
3
Causal knowledge and the development of inductive reasoning.因果知识与归纳推理的发展
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jun;122:48-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.015. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
4
Conceptualization of category-oriented likelihood ratio: a useful tool for clinical diagnostic reasoning.类别导向似然比的概念化:临床诊断推理的有用工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Nov 17;11:94. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-94.
5
The engine of thought is a hybrid: roles of associative and structured knowledge in reasoning.思维的引擎是一种混合体:联想知识和结构知识在推理中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2082-102. doi: 10.1037/a0037653. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
6
Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning.在预测推理中忽视替代原因,但在诊断推理中则不然。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):329-36. doi: 10.1177/0956797610361430. Epub 2010 Feb 17.
7
Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.因果归纳的联想与因果推理理论:预测性与诊断性推理中的对称性与非对称性
Mem Cognit. 2005 Dec;33(8):1388-98. doi: 10.3758/bf03193371.
8
Knowledge is not enough to solve the problems - The role of diagnostic knowledge in clinical reasoning activities.知识不足以解决问题——诊断知识在临床推理活动中的作用。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Nov 24;16(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0821-z.
9
Use of Inductive, Problem-Based Clinical Reasoning Enhances Diagnostic Accuracy in Final-Year Veterinary Students.
J Vet Med Educ. 2020 Jul;47(4):506-515. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0818-097r1. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Inductive reasoning 2.0.归纳推理 2.0.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2018 May;9(3):e1459. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1459. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The diversity principle and the evaluation of evidence.多样性原则与证据评价。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Aug;29(4):1270-1294. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02065-5. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
2
Developmental Changes in Strategies for Gathering Evidence About Biological Kinds.关于生物类别的证据收集策略的发展变化。
Cogn Sci. 2020 May;44(5):e12837. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12837.
3
Is the most representative skunk the average or the stinkiest? Developmental changes in representations of biological categories.最具代表性的臭鼬是普通的还是最臭的?生物类别代表性的发展变化。

本文引用的文献

1
Diversity-based reasoning in children.儿童基于多样性的推理。
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Dec;43(4):243-73. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0757.
2
Causal knowledge and categories: the effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity.因果知识与类别:因果信念对分类、归纳及相似性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):323-60. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.323.
3
Causal status as a determinant of feature centrality.作为特征中心性决定因素的因果状态。
Cogn Psychol. 2019 May;110:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.12.004. Epub 2019 Jan 21.
4
The diversity effect in diagnostic reasoning.诊断推理中的多样性效应。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jul;44(5):789-805. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0592-0.
5
The conceptual centrality of causal cycles.因果循环在概念上的核心地位。
Mem Cognit. 2009 Sep;37(6):744-58. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.6.744.
6
Causal diversity effects in information seeking.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Feb;15(1):81-8. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.1.81.
7
Sample diversity and premise typicality in inductive reasoning: evidence for developmental change.归纳推理中的样本多样性和前提典型性:发育变化的证据
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):543-56. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.002. Epub 2008 Apr 23.
8
Explanation and understanding.解释与理解。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:227-54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190100.
9
Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):340-4. doi: 10.3758/bf03196382.
10
Even with a green card, you can be put out to pasture and still have to work: non-native intuitions of the transparency of common English idioms.即使有了绿卡,你仍可能被淘汰却还得工作:对于常见英语习语透明度的非本土直觉。
Mem Cognit. 2004 Sep;32(6):896-904. doi: 10.3758/bf03196868.
Cogn Psychol. 2000 Dec;41(4):361-416. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0741.
4
Do houseflies think? Patterns of induction and biological beliefs in development.
Cognition. 1998 Apr;66(1):33-49. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(97)00049-8.
5
Children's use of sample size and diversity information within basic-level categories.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Feb;64(2):159-74. doi: 10.1006/jecp.1996.2344.
6
The diversity principle in the testing of arguments.论证测试中的多样性原则。
Mem Cognit. 1995 May;23(3):374-82. doi: 10.3758/bf03197238.
7
The development of category-based induction.基于类别的归纳推理的发展
Child Dev. 1992 Oct;63(5):1070-90.