Vollmar Brigitte, Slotta Jan E, Nickels Ruth M, Wenzel Ernst, Menger Michael D
Institute for Clinical & Experimental Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Microcirculation. 2003 Apr;10(2):143-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.mn.7800179.
In vitro and in vivo studies using isolated platelets require that the cells used for testing are not activated by the isolation procedure. This ensures that the effects measured by the test are the result of the environment or the applied stimulus, but is not an artifact resulting from activation by cell isolation.
Herein, we analyzed two different platelet isolation procedures (i.e., a Sepharose column versus density gradient centrifugation) with special emphasis on cell activation, including flow cytometric analysis of P-selectin expression, functional quantification of mechanical platelet retention, light microscopic assessment of platelet aggregation, and fluorescence microscopic determination of in vivo rat liver platelet-endothelium cell interaction.
Under resting conditions, Sepharose column-isolated platelets showed a negligible fraction of only 2.7 +/- 3.3% cells (mean +/- SEM) with P-selectin expression, and an appropriate response (i.e., a 33-fold increase) upon activation with thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP). In contrast, density gradient centrifugation resulted in P-selectin expression under resting conditions of approximately 50% of the isolated cells and only a 1.6-fold increase on further TRAP stimulation. In addition, density gradient-isolated platelets, but not Sepharose column-isolated platelets, showed increased mechanical retention and agglutination/aggregation in vitro, as well as pronounced adhesion to hepatic venular endothelium in vivo. Interestingly, density gradient-isolated platelets additionally induced in vivo an increase of colocalization of platelets with adherent leukocytes, indicating a generalized microvascular inflammatory response that is comparable to that observed after a 60-minute ischemia/30-minute reperfusion insult.
Density gradient centrifugation-isolated platelets, but not Sepharose column-isolated platelets, are activated already under resting conditions and induce in vivo a platelet-leukocyte-endothelial cell-associated inflammatory response. Thus, we propose that the method of platelet isolation using the Sepharose column is superior to the density gradient centrifugation technique and might therefore be preferred for in vitro and in vivo assays to study platelet function.
使用分离的血小板进行体外和体内研究时,要求用于测试的细胞不会因分离过程而被激活。这可确保测试所测得的效应是环境或所施加刺激的结果,而非细胞分离激活所导致的假象。
在此,我们分析了两种不同的血小板分离程序(即琼脂糖柱法与密度梯度离心法),特别关注细胞激活情况,包括通过流式细胞术分析P-选择素表达、对机械性血小板滞留进行功能定量、通过光学显微镜评估血小板聚集以及通过荧光显微镜测定体内大鼠肝脏中血小板与内皮细胞的相互作用。
在静息条件下,通过琼脂糖柱法分离的血小板仅有可忽略不计的一小部分(2.7±3.3%的细胞,均值±标准误)表达P-选择素,在用凝血酶受体激活肽(TRAP)激活后有适当反应(即增加33倍)。相比之下,密度梯度离心法在静息条件下导致约50%的分离细胞表达P-选择素,在进一步用TRAP刺激时仅增加1.6倍。此外,密度梯度离心法分离的血小板(而非琼脂糖柱法分离的血小板)在体外显示出机械性滞留增加以及凝集/聚集增加,在体内对肝小静脉内皮有明显黏附。有趣的是,密度梯度离心法分离的血小板在体内还额外诱导血小板与黏附白细胞的共定位增加,表明存在一种全身性微血管炎症反应,这与60分钟缺血/30分钟再灌注损伤后观察到的情况相当。
密度梯度离心法分离的血小板(而非琼脂糖柱法分离的血小板)在静息条件下即已被激活,并在体内诱导血小板-白细胞-内皮细胞相关的炎症反应。因此,我们提出使用琼脂糖柱法分离血小板的方法优于密度梯度离心技术,因此可能更适合用于体外和体内研究血小板功能的实验。