• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向卫生技术评估的透明度:卫生技术评估报告清单

Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA reports.

作者信息

Hailey David

机构信息

Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):1-7. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000011.

DOI:10.1017/s0266462303000011
PMID:12701934
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

As an initiative of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA), a checklist for assessment reports was developed as a means of improving transparency and consistency in HTA.

METHODS

Preparation of a summary of key elements in HTA reports, drawing on experience in preparation of such documents, information from guidelines for HTA, and individual assessments. Review by INAHTA agencies and modification of the summary to reflect the consensus.

RESULTS

The resulting checklist includes 17 questions, with supporting detail. General areas covered include preliminary information, why and how the assessment has been prepared, the results of the assessment, implications of the results, and conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

The checklist is intended to be considered by those preparing or using an HTA report. It reflects the views of INAHTA members and is seen as a mechanism to improve the standard of HTA reports, being complementary to the more detailed guidelines on how to conduct assessments.

摘要

目标

作为国际卫生技术评估机构网络(INAHTA)的一项举措,制定了一份评估报告清单,作为提高卫生技术评估透明度和一致性的一种手段。

方法

借鉴编写此类文件的经验、卫生技术评估指南中的信息以及个别评估,编写卫生技术评估报告关键要素摘要。由INAHTA机构进行审查,并对摘要进行修改以反映共识。

结果

最终形成的清单包括17个问题及相关详细说明。涵盖的一般领域包括初步信息、评估的编制原因和方式、评估结果、结果的影响以及结论。

结论

该清单供编写或使用卫生技术评估报告的人员参考。它反映了INAHTA成员的观点,被视为提高卫生技术评估报告标准的一种机制,是对关于如何进行评估的更详细指南的补充。

相似文献

1
Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA reports.迈向卫生技术评估的透明度:卫生技术评估报告清单
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):1-7. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000011.
2
HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT EVIDENCE ON E-HEALTH/M-HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES: EVALUATING THE TRANSPARENCY AND THOROUGHNESS.电子健康/移动健康技术的健康技术评估证据:评估透明度和彻底性。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(1):87-96. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317004512. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
3
Development of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment.国际卫生技术评估机构网络的发展
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:24-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090370. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
4
What's in a name? Developing definitions for common health technology assessment product types of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (inahta).名称中有什么?为国际卫生技术评估机构网络(INAHTA)的常见卫生技术评估产品类型制定定义。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Oct;30(4):430-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000543. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
5
Validity of original studies in health technology assessment reports: significance of standardized assessment and reporting.卫生技术评估报告中原研研究的有效性:标准化评估与报告的意义
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Summer;21(3):410-3. doi: 10.1017/s0266462305050543.
6
The 'Top 10' Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint.十大健康技术评估挑战:INAHTA 观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):1-4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000825. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
7
Policies for Use of Real-World Data in Health Technology Assessment (HTA): A Comparative Study of Six HTA Agencies.卫生技术评估(HTA)中真实世界数据的使用政策:六个HTA机构的比较研究
Value Health. 2017 Apr;20(4):520-532. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
8
Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by Inahta agencies.卫生技术评估机构中消费者对卫生技术评估活动的参与。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):79-83. doi: 10.1017/S026646231200075X. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
9
Demonstrating the influence of HTA: INAHTA member stories of HTA impact.展示 HTA 的影响:INAHTA 成员的 HTA 影响故事。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Nov 5;37:e8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000835.
10
Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe.全球卫生技术评估机构对循证审议流程的使用。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Jan 1;9(1):27-33. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.72.

引用本文的文献

1
Global research on patient involvement in health technology assessment: a bibliometric analysis.全球关于患者参与卫生技术评估的研究:一项文献计量分析。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2025 Jul 25;10(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41256-025-00431-z.
2
The Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Outcomes of Using Ferric Derisomaltose for the Management of Iron Deficiency in China: A Rapid Health Technology Assessment.在中国使用蔗糖铁治疗缺铁性贫血的疗效、安全性及经济结果:一项快速卫生技术评估
Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11):e48717. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48717. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Research gaps identified in Iran's health technology assessment reports.
伊朗卫生技术评估报告中的研究空白。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 11;21(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01043-0.
4
The Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes for Health Benefit Package Design in Kazakhstan.利用循证审议程序进行哈萨克斯坦医保福利包设计
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 10;19(18):11412. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811412.
5
Efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness analysis of aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer: A rapid health technology assessment.阿柏西普治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效、安全性及成本效益分析:一项快速卫生技术评估
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Aug 30;13:914683. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.914683. eCollection 2022.
6
How innovation can be defined, evaluated and rewarded in health technology assessment.在卫生技术评估中,创新如何被定义、评估和奖励。
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Jan 3;12(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13561-021-00342-y.
7
Impact assessment of Iran's health technology assessment programme.伊朗卫生技术评估计划的影响评估。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Feb 22;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0286-0.
8
Systematic Review of the Toxicity of Long-Course Oral Corticosteroids in Children.儿童长期口服皮质类固醇毒性的系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170259. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170259. eCollection 2017.
9
EOS imaging versus current radiography: A health technology assessment study.EOS成像与传统放射成像:一项卫生技术评估研究。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Feb 17;30:331. eCollection 2016.
10
Reporting quality of search methods in systematic reviews of HIV behavioral interventions (2000-2010): are the searches clearly explained, systematic and reproducible?HIV行为干预系统评价中检索方法的报告质量(2000 - 2010年):检索过程是否解释清晰、系统且可重复?
Res Synth Methods. 2014 Jun;5(2):116-30. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1098. Epub 2013 Oct 8.