• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生技术评估机构中消费者对卫生技术评估活动的参与。

Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by Inahta agencies.

机构信息

University of Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):79-83. doi: 10.1017/S026646231200075X. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1017/S026646231200075X
PMID:23217279
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To obtain further information from members of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) on the involvement of consumers in their programs.

METHODS

A questionnaire for a survey was developed and sent to member agencies in November 2010. Survey responses were compared with those from an earlier survey conducted in 2005.

RESULTS

Of the thirty-three agencies that provided responses, 67 percent involve consumers in some aspects of their health technology assessment (HTA) programs, compared with 57 percent in 2005. As in the earlier survey, most agencies reporting involvement have contact with consumer or patient organizations and a large minority also involve individual consumers. Summaries of HTA reports that are intended to be easily understood by consumers are prepared by 84 percent of the agencies, and 42 percent involve consumers in dissemination of HTA material. In both areas, there was some increase from the levels previously reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The survey results suggest that there is a trend to increased involvement of consumers by the INAHTA agencies in their programs but that the level of involvement remains relatively limited. The manner of consumer participation varies between agencies.

摘要

目的

从国际卫生技术评估机构网络(INAHTA)的成员那里获取更多关于消费者参与其项目的信息。

方法

制定了一份调查问卷,并于 2010 年 11 月发送给成员机构。将调查结果与 2005 年进行的早期调查结果进行了比较。

结果

在提供回复的三十三个机构中,有 67%的机构在其卫生技术评估(HTA)项目的某些方面涉及消费者,而 2005 年的比例为 57%。与早期调查一样,大多数报告有涉及的机构都与消费者或患者组织有联系,极少数机构还涉及个别消费者。84%的机构编写了旨在让消费者容易理解的 HTA 报告摘要,42%的机构让消费者参与 HTA 材料的传播。在这两个领域,都比之前报告的水平有所提高。

结论

调查结果表明,INAHTA 机构在其项目中越来越倾向于让消费者参与,但参与程度仍然相对有限。消费者参与的方式在各机构之间有所不同。

相似文献

1
Involvement of consumers in health technology assessment activities by Inahta agencies.卫生技术评估机构中消费者对卫生技术评估活动的参与。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Jan;29(1):79-83. doi: 10.1017/S026646231200075X. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
2
Survey on the involvement of consumers in health technology assessment programs.消费者参与卫生技术评估项目的调查。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Fall;22(4):497-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462306051427.
3
Development of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment.国际卫生技术评估机构网络的发展
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:24-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309090370. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
4
EVALUATION OF PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT INITIATIVES IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL AGENCIES.评估健康技术评估中的患者和公众参与倡议:对国际机构的调查。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(6):715-723. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000976. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
5
What's in a name? Developing definitions for common health technology assessment product types of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (inahta).名称中有什么?为国际卫生技术评估机构网络(INAHTA)的常见卫生技术评估产品类型制定定义。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Oct;30(4):430-7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000543. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
6
Health technology assessment agencies: an international overview of organizational aspects.卫生技术评估机构:组织层面的国际概述
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Fall;23(4):414-24. doi: 10.1017/S026646230707064X.
7
The 'Top 10' Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint.十大健康技术评估挑战:INAHTA 观点。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020;36(1):1-4. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000825. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
8
Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA reports.迈向卫生技术评估的透明度:卫生技术评估报告清单
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 Winter;19(1):1-7. doi: 10.1017/s0266462303000011.
9
Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe.全球卫生技术评估机构对循证审议流程的使用。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Jan 1;9(1):27-33. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.72.
10
A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments.快速卫生技术评估的影响初步调查
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25(3):415-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462309990067.

引用本文的文献

1
Celebrating 30 years of the international network of agencies for health technology assessment (INAHTA).庆祝卫生技术评估机构国际网络(INAHTA)成立30周年。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Feb 3;41(1):e7. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325000042.
2
Experiences of patient organizations' involvement in medicine appraisal and reimbursement processes in Finland - a qualitative study.芬兰患者组织参与药品评估和报销流程的经验 - 一项定性研究。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Jul 2;40(1):e26. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000229.
3
Potential Barriers of Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment in Central and Eastern European Countries.
中东欧国家中患者参与健康技术评估的潜在障碍。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;10:922708. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.922708. eCollection 2022.
4
Information Patients With Melanoma Spontaneously Report About Health-Related Quality of Life on Web-Based Forums: Case Study.信息 黑素瘤患者在基于网络的论坛上自发报告的与健康相关的生活质量:案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 7;23(12):e27497. doi: 10.2196/27497.
5
Patient and public involvement in health technology decision-making processes in Brazil.巴西卫生技术决策过程中的患者和公众参与。
Rev Saude Publica. 2020 Dec 11;54:136. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054002453. eCollection 2020.
6
Use of Evidence-Informed Deliberative Processes by Health Technology Assessment Agencies Around the Globe.全球卫生技术评估机构对循证审议流程的使用。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Jan 1;9(1):27-33. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.72.
7
Co-construction of health technology assessment recommendations with patients: An example with cardiac defibrillator replacement.与患者共同构建卫生技术评估建议:以心脏除颤器更换为例。
Health Expect. 2020 Feb;23(1):182-192. doi: 10.1111/hex.12989. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
8
Financial interests of patient organisations contributing to technology assessment at England's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: policy review.患者组织对英格兰国家卫生与保健优化研究所技术评估的财务利益贡献:政策回顾。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 16;364:k5300. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5300.
9
Including the public perspective in health-related MCDA: ideas from the field of public opinion research and polling.将公众视角纳入与健康相关的多标准决策分析:来自民意调查研究领域的观点
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Nov 9;16(Suppl 1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12962-018-0123-x. eCollection 2018.
10
Validity of the Patient Experiences and Satisfaction with Medications (PESaM) Questionnaire.患者对药物的体验和满意度(PESaM)问卷的有效性。
Patient. 2019 Feb;12(1):149-162. doi: 10.1007/s40271-018-0340-6.