Suppr超能文献

对四个州儿童福利设计团队的评估。

An evaluation of child welfare design teams in four states.

作者信息

Anderson-Butcher Dawn, Lawson Hal A, Barkdull Carenlee

机构信息

College of Social Work, The Ohio State University, 325D Stillman Hall, 1947 College Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

J Health Soc Policy. 2002;15(3-4):131-61. doi: 10.1300/J045v15n03_10.

Abstract

Empowerment-oriented design teams were structured in four states to promote collaborative practices among professionals and former clients. These teams were structured to serve as both learning and training systems, and they identified competencies for collaborative practices. Because these design teams represent a new learning and improvement system for child welfare and related service systems, and because these systems need more effective approaches to learning, training, and improvement, outcomes-oriented evaluations are imperative. The outcomes evaluation reported here relied on two evaluation strategies. First, 48 design team members completed follow-up surveys; these surveys explored individuals' perceptions of their design team involvement. Second, 22 design team members were interviewed directly; they were asked questions about the benefits and accomplishments resulting from their design team experience. These data from both evaluation strategies indicate that design teams promoted family-centered practice and interprofessional collaboration; enhanced service delivery and an understanding of co-occurring needs; and fostered personal growth and self-awareness among participants. These commonalties and similarities were surprising and interesting because design teams in the four states proceeded differently. These findings are discussed in relation to emergent theory on collaborative learning processes and products.

摘要

以赋权为导向的设计团队在四个州组建,以促进专业人员与前服务对象之间的协作实践。这些团队的组建旨在充当学习和培训系统,并确定协作实践的能力要求。由于这些设计团队代表了儿童福利及相关服务系统的一种新的学习和改进系统,且由于这些系统需要更有效的学习、培训和改进方法,因此必须进行以结果为导向的评估。此处报告的结果评估依赖于两种评估策略。首先,48名设计团队成员完成了后续调查;这些调查探讨了个人对其参与设计团队的看法。其次,直接采访了22名设计团队成员;询问了他们有关设计团队经历所带来的益处和成就的问题。这两种评估策略得出的数据表明,设计团队促进了以家庭为中心的实践和跨专业协作;改善了服务提供并增进了对共同需求的理解;并促进了参与者的个人成长和自我认知。这些共同点和相似之处令人惊讶且有趣,因为四个州的设计团队采取的方式各不相同。结合关于协作学习过程和成果的新兴理论对这些发现进行了讨论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验