Picardi A, Pasquini P, Cattaruzza M S, Gaetano P, Melchi C F, Baliva G, Camaioni D, Tiago A, Abeni D, Biondi M
Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Dermatological Institute IDI-IRCCS, University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Rome, Italy.
Psychother Psychosom. 2003 May-Jun;72(3):150-8. doi: 10.1159/000069731.
It has often been suggested that stress might trigger vitiligo. However, only one study supported this hypothesis, and no study explored the role of other personality or social factors.
Out-patients experiencing a recent onset or exacerbation of vitiligo (n = 31) were compared with out-patients with skin conditions in which psychosomatic factors are commonly were regarded as negligible (n = 116). Stressful events during the last 12 months were assessed with Paykel's Interview for Recent Life Events. Attachment style, alexithymia and social support were assessed with the 'Experiences in Close Relationships' questionnaire, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, respectively.
Cases and controls did not differ regarding the total number of events and the number of undesirable, uncontrollable or major events. Three or more uncontrollable events had occurred more frequently among cases than controls. Perceived social support was lower in cases than in controls. Cases scored higher than controls on anxious attachment, tended towards higher scores on avoidant attachment and were classified more often as insecure. Cases scored higher than controls on the TAS-20 and were classified more often as alexithymic or borderline alexithymic. The occurrence of many uncontrollable events, alexithymia and anxious attachment were associated with vitiligo also in multiple logistic regression analysis.
These findings suggest that vulnerability to vitiligo is not increased by stressful events, except for many uncontrollable events. Alexithymia, insecure attachment and poor social support appear to increase susceptibility to vitiligo, possibly through deficits in emotion regulation or reduced ability to cope effectively with stress.
人们常认为压力可能引发白癜风。然而,仅有一项研究支持这一假说,且尚无研究探讨其他人格或社会因素的作用。
将近期白癜风发病或病情加重的门诊患者(n = 31)与通常认为心身因素可忽略不计的皮肤病门诊患者(n = 116)进行比较。采用佩克尔近期生活事件访谈评估过去12个月内的应激事件。分别用“亲密关系体验”问卷、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS - 20)和领悟社会支持多维量表评估依恋风格、述情障碍和社会支持。
病例组和对照组在事件总数以及不良、不可控或重大事件数量方面无差异。病例组中发生三件或更多不可控事件的频率高于对照组。病例组的领悟社会支持低于对照组。病例组在焦虑依恋方面得分高于对照组,在回避依恋方面得分倾向于更高,且更常被归类为不安全型。病例组在TAS - 20上的得分高于对照组,且更常被归类为述情障碍或边缘性述情障碍。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,许多不可控事件的发生、述情障碍和焦虑依恋也与白癜风相关。
这些发现表明,除了许多不可控事件外,应激事件不会增加患白癜风的易感性。述情障碍、不安全依恋和社会支持不足似乎会增加患白癜风的易感性,可能是通过情绪调节缺陷或有效应对压力的能力降低所致。