• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芥子气过敏的前瞻性研究:首例双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验研究(24例)

Prospective study of mustard allergy: first study with double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge trials (24 cases).

作者信息

Morisset M, Moneret-Vautrin D-A, Maadi F, Frémont S, Guénard L, Croizier A, Kanny G

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Nancy, France.

出版信息

Allergy. 2003 Apr;58(4):295-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00074.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00074.x
PMID:12708976
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mustard allergy accounts for 1.1% of food allergies in children. However, double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge trials (DB PCFCs) have not yet been proposed.

OBJECTIVE

To carry out DB PCFCs to determine the real frequency of mustard allergy in patients sensitized to mustard.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted in 30 subjects aged 3-20 years presenting positive prick tests to ground mustard seeds (Brassica nigra), mustard flour (B. juncea), metabisulfite-free strong mustard seasoning (B. juncea) and a commercialized allergenic extract (B. nigra). Twenty-seven subjects were screened for mustard-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE). PCFCs were carried out either DB or single blind (SB) with up to 1340 mg of metabisulfite-free seasoning.

RESULTS

The mean diameter of the wheal induced by prick tests with the allergenic extract was lower (n.s.) than that induced by the native mustard products: 5.8 mm (1.5-15) vs 6.9 mm (0.5-18) for B. nigra ground seeds, 7.8 mm (1-20) for B. juncea flour and 9.7 mm (3-20) for the strong mustard seasoning. The diameter of the wheal induced by the allergenic extract was significantly different from that induced by the mustard seasoning (P < 0.005). The mean of mustard specific-IgE values was 8.7 KU/l (0.35-72.4). Seven of 30 food challenges were considered positive. Mean prick test results in the positive and negative PCFC subgroups were 5.5 mm vs 5.9 mm for the commercialized extract, 10.9 mm vs 5.8 mm for B. nigra ground seeds (P < 0.01), 9.9 mm vs 7.1 mm for B. juncea flour (n.s. P > 0.25) and 11.5 mm vs 9.1 mm for the metabisulfite-free mustard seasoning (n.s. P > 0.1). Mean specific IgE values determined by CAP system radioallergosorbent test (Phadebas Pharmacia) were higher but not significantly so (P > 0.25) in the subgroup with mustard allergy (12.3 K/l vs 7.6 KU/l).

CONCLUSIONS

About 23.3% of the sensitized subjects were allergic to a routine dose of mustard. Positive prick tests and the presence of specific IgE were not predictive. SB PCFC or DB PCFC is required before recommending avoidance diets.

摘要

背景

芥末过敏占儿童食物过敏的1.1%。然而,尚未有双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DB PCFCs)的相关报道。

目的

开展双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验,以确定对芥末致敏患者中芥末过敏的实际发生率。

方法

对30名年龄在3至20岁之间的受试者进行前瞻性研究,这些受试者对磨碎的芥菜籽(黑芥)、芥末粉(芥菜)、无偏亚硫酸氢盐的浓芥末调味料(芥菜)和一种商业化变应原提取物(黑芥)的点刺试验呈阳性。对27名受试者检测芥末特异性免疫球蛋白E(IgE)。采用双盲或单盲方式进行食物激发试验,使用剂量最高达1340毫克的无偏亚硫酸氢盐调味料。

结果

变应原提取物点刺试验诱发的风团平均直径低于天然芥末产品诱发的风团平均直径(无统计学差异):黑芥磨碎种子诱发的风团平均直径为5.8毫米(1.5 - 15),而天然黑芥产品诱发的为6.9毫米(0.5 - 18);芥菜粉诱发的风团平均直径为7.8毫米(1 - 20);浓芥末调味料诱发的风团平均直径为9.7毫米(3 - 20)。变应原提取物诱发的风团直径与芥末调味料诱发的风团直径有显著差异(P < 0.005)。芥末特异性IgE值的平均值为8.7 KU/l(0.35 - 72.4)。30次食物激发试验中有7次被判定为阳性。在食物激发试验阳性和阴性亚组中,商业化提取物的点刺试验平均结果分别为5.5毫米和5.9毫米;黑芥磨碎种子的点刺试验平均结果分别为10.9毫米和5.8毫米(P < 0.01);芥菜粉的点刺试验平均结果分别为9.9毫米和7.1毫米(P > 0.25,无统计学差异);无偏亚硫酸氢盐芥末调味料的点刺试验平均结果分别为11.5毫米和9.1毫米(P > 0.1,无统计学差异)。通过CAP系统放射变应原吸附试验(法玛西亚公司)测定的芥末过敏亚组中特异性IgE值较高,但无显著差异(P > 0.25)(12.3 K/l对7.6 KU/l)。

结论

约23.3%的致敏受试者对常规剂量的芥末过敏。点刺试验阳性和特异性IgE的存在并无预测价值。在推荐避免食用某种食物的饮食之前,需要进行单盲食物激发试验或双盲食物激发试验。

相似文献

1
Prospective study of mustard allergy: first study with double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge trials (24 cases).芥子气过敏的前瞻性研究:首例双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验研究(24例)
Allergy. 2003 Apr;58(4):295-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00074.x.
2
Mustard allergy in children.儿童芥末过敏
Allergy. 2000 May;55(5):496-500. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2000.00383.x.
3
Mustard allergy confirmed by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges: clinical features and cross-reactivity with mugwort pollen and plant-derived foods.通过双盲安慰剂对照食物激发试验确诊的芥末过敏:临床特征及与艾蒿花粉和植物源性食物的交叉反应性
Allergy. 2005 Jan;60(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00644.x.
4
Relationship between food-specific IgE concentrations and the risk of positive food challenges in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年食物特异性IgE浓度与食物激发试验阳性风险之间的关系。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Oct;100(4):444-51. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70133-7.
5
Prevalence of IgE-mediated food allergy among children with atopic dermatitis.特应性皮炎患儿中IgE介导的食物过敏患病率。
Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3):E8. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.3.e8.
6
Atopy patch tests, together with determination of specific IgE levels, reduce the need for oral food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis.特应性斑贴试验,结合特异性IgE水平的测定,减少了特应性皮炎患儿进行口服食物激发试验的必要性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Mar;107(3):548-53. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.112849.
7
Maize food allergy: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.玉米食物过敏:一项双盲安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Dec;38(12):1943-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.03094.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
8
Clinical characteristics of patients with mustard hypersensitivity.芥子气过敏患者的临床特征。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002 Aug;89(2):166-71. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61933-3.
9
Thresholds of clinical reactivity to milk, egg, peanut and sesame in immunoglobulin E-dependent allergies: evaluation by double-blind or single-blind placebo-controlled oral challenges.免疫球蛋白E介导的牛奶、鸡蛋、花生和芝麻过敏的临床反应阈值:通过双盲或单盲安慰剂对照口服激发试验进行评估。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Aug;33(8):1046-51. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01734.x.
10
Improved screening for peanut allergy by the combined use of skin prick tests and specific IgE assays.通过联合使用皮肤点刺试验和特异性IgE检测来改进花生过敏筛查。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002 Jun;109(6):1027-33. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.124775.

引用本文的文献

1
Brassicaceae Mustards: Phytochemical Constituents, Pharmacological Effects, and Mechanisms of Action against Human Disease.芸薹属植物:植物化学成分、药理作用及对人类疾病作用机制。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 20;25(16):9039. doi: 10.3390/ijms25169039.
2
Re-evaluation of behenic acid from mustard seeds to be used in the manufacturing of certain emulsifiers pursuant to Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 - for permanent exemption from labelling.根据欧盟第1169/2011号法规第21(2)条,对用于制造某些乳化剂的芥菜籽山嵛酸进行重新评估,以获得永久标签豁免。
EFSA J. 2023 Sep 25;21(9):e08240. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8240. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Biologically Active Compounds in Mustard Seeds: A Toxicological Perspective.
芥子籽中的生物活性化合物:毒理学视角
Foods. 2021 Sep 3;10(9):2089. doi: 10.3390/foods10092089.
4
Detection and identification of allergens from Canadian mustard varieties of and .检测和鉴定来自加拿大芥菜品种 和 的过敏原。
Biomolecules. 2019 Sep 14;9(9):489. doi: 10.3390/biom9090489.
5
A Comprehensive Review on Mustard-Induced Allergy and Implications for Human Health.关于芥菜诱发过敏及其对人类健康影响的综合评述。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Aug;57(1):39-54. doi: 10.1007/s12016-017-8651-2.
6
The development of a standardised diet history tool to support the diagnosis of food allergy.开发标准化饮食史工具以支持食物过敏诊断。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2015 Feb 19;5:7. doi: 10.1186/s13601-015-0050-2. eCollection 2015.
7
Food production and processing considerations of allergenic food ingredients: a review.致敏性食品成分的食品生产与加工考量:综述
J Allergy (Cairo). 2012;2012:746125. doi: 10.1155/2012/746125. Epub 2011 Dec 1.