Roberts I S D, Benbow E W, Bisset R, Jenkins J P R, Lee S H, Reid H, Jackson A
Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals, UK.
Histopathology. 2003 May;42(5):424-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01614.x.
To determine the accuracy and define the limitations of post mortem magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining the cause of sudden death in adults.
Sudden unexpected adult deaths in the community, reported to the Coroner (n = 10), excluding suspicious, violent or potentially drug-related deaths, were submitted to whole body MRI, followed by full invasive autopsy. The MRI scans were reported independently by four radiologists, blinded to the autopsy findings; two had previous experience of post mortem MRI. An abnormality that related to the cause of death as identified at autopsy, was identified by at least one radiologist in eight cases. These were pulmonary consolidation (autopsy finding pneumonia) (n = 1), pneumoperitoneum (autopsy finding perforated peptic ulcer) (n = 2), left ventricular failure (autopsy finding ischaemic heart disease) (n = 4), and disseminated bronchial carcinoma (n = 1). However, in only one case were all radiologists able to provide a confident cause of death (disseminated bronchial carcinoma). In two cases, in which death occurred 2-6 days and 3-6 days before MRI, early decomposition prevented interpretation of the images. Severe coronary artery atheroma was detected at autopsy in 7/10, but these lesions were not detected by MRI. Previous experience in reporting post mortem MRI, without autopsy comparison, did not result in more accurate interpretation of the images.
This pilot study suggests that post mortem MRI can identify some abnormalities relating to the common causes of sudden death in adults, but there is a need for greater experience in correlating MRI with autopsy findings before a reliable cause of death can be made by MRI alone. Inability to image coronary artery lesions, differentiating thrombus from clot and pulmonary oedema from pneumonic exudates, are specific problems that may be corrected with greater experience and higher resolution scans.
确定成人猝死原因的尸检磁共振成像(MRI)的准确性并明确其局限性。
向验尸官报告的社区内成人意外猝死病例(n = 10),排除可疑、暴力或可能与药物相关的死亡病例,进行全身MRI检查,随后进行全面的侵入性尸检。MRI扫描由四位放射科医生独立报告,他们对尸检结果不知情;其中两位有尸检MRI的经验。八位病例中至少有一位放射科医生识别出与尸检确定的死亡原因相关的异常。这些异常包括肺实变(尸检结果为肺炎)(n = 1)、气腹(尸检结果为消化性溃疡穿孔)(n = 2)、左心室衰竭(尸检结果为缺血性心脏病)(n = 4)和弥漫性支气管癌(n = 1)。然而,只有一例所有放射科医生都能明确给出死亡原因(弥漫性支气管癌)。在两例病例中,死亡分别发生在MRI检查前2 - 6天和3 - 6天,早期尸体腐败妨碍了图像解读。尸检发现7/10的病例有严重冠状动脉粥样硬化,但MRI未检测到这些病变。既往在无尸检对照的情况下报告尸检MRI的经验,并未使图像解读更准确。
这项初步研究表明,尸检MRI可识别一些与成人猝死常见原因相关的异常,但在仅通过MRI就能可靠确定死亡原因之前,需要更多将MRI与尸检结果相关联的经验。无法对冠状动脉病变成像、区分血栓与血凝块以及区分肺水肿与肺炎性渗出物是特定问题,可能通过更多经验和更高分辨率扫描得到纠正。