Kimmerling Mina, Wagner Glenn, Ghosh-Dastidar Bonnie
RAND, 1700 Main Street, MS-26, Santa Monica, California 90407, USA.
Int J STD AIDS. 2003 Apr;14(4):281-4. doi: 10.1258/095646203321264917.
The purpose of this study was to determine the conditions in which self-reports provide an accurate assessment of adherence to HIV antiretrovirals. In a sample of 58 participants, self-reported and electronically monitored adherence to antiretroviral therapy were compared over a three-day period. Of the 16 who reported missed doses, only six (38%) accurately reported the number of doses they took, although the electronic monitoring data confirmed that all but one (94%) did in fact miss at least one dose. In contrast, 25 (60%) of the 42 participants who reported no missed doses were accurate. Nearly all (96%) participants who actually did take all their doses accurately reported their adherence compared to only 20% of those who missed at least one dose (P<0.001). Cognitive functioning was marginally associated with self-report accuracy, but all other baseline factors were not associated with accuracy. Our findings highlight the need for more effective self-report methodology and a better understanding of the circumstances in which self-reports are valid measures of adherence.
本研究的目的是确定自我报告能够准确评估抗逆转录病毒药物依从性的条件。在一个由58名参与者组成的样本中,对自我报告的和通过电子监测的抗逆转录病毒疗法依从性进行了为期三天的比较。在报告有漏服剂量的16人中,只有6人(38%)准确报告了他们服用的剂量数,尽管电子监测数据证实除一人外(94%)所有人确实至少漏服了一剂。相比之下,在报告无漏服剂量的42名参与者中,有25人(60%)报告准确。几乎所有实际服用了全部剂量的参与者(96%)都准确报告了他们的依从性,而至少漏服一剂的参与者中只有20%报告准确(P<0.001)。认知功能与自我报告准确性有微弱关联,但所有其他基线因素与准确性均无关联。我们的研究结果凸显了需要更有效的自我报告方法,以及更好地理解自我报告作为依从性有效衡量指标的情况。