• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过两个问题反复评估的自我报告的抗逆转录病毒治疗不依从性可预测病毒学抑制患者的治疗失败。

Self-reported non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy repeatedly assessed by two questions predicts treatment failure in virologically suppressed patients.

作者信息

Glass Tracy R, De Geest Sabina, Hirschel Bernard, Battegay Manuel, Furrer Hansjakob, Covassini Matthias, Vernazza Pietro L, Bernasconi Enos, Rickenboch Martin, Weber Rainer, Bucher Heiner C

机构信息

Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Antivir Ther. 2008;13(1):77-85.

PMID:18389901
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to explore the predictive value of longitudinal self-reported adherence data on viral rebound.

METHODS

Individuals in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study on combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) with RNA <50 copies/ml over the previous 3 months and who were interviewed about adherence at least once prior to 1 March 2007 were eligible. Adherence was defined in terms of missed doses of cART (0, 1, 2 or >2) in the previous 28 days. Viral rebound was defined as RNA >500 copies/ml. Cox regression models with time-independent and -dependent covariates were used to evaluate time to viral rebound.

RESULTS

A total of 2,664 individuals and 15,530 visits were included. Across all visits, missing doses were reported as follows: 1 dose 14.7%, 2 doses 5.1%, >2 doses 3.8% taking <95% of doses 4.5% and missing > or =2 consecutive doses 3.2%. In total, 308 (11.6%) patients experienced viral rebound. After controlling for confounding variables, self-reported non-adherence remained significantly associated with the rate of occurrence of viral rebound (compared with zero missed doses: 1 dose, hazard ratio [HR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-1.48; 2 doses, HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.46-3.25; >2 doses, HR 3.66, 95% CI 2.50-5.34). Several variables significantly associated with an increased risk of viral rebound irrespective of adherence were identified: being on a protease inhibitor or triple nucleoside regimen (compared with a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor), >5 previous cART regimens, seeing a less-experienced physician, taking co-medication, and a shorter time virally suppressed.

CONCLUSIONS

A simple self-report adherence questionnaire repeatedly administered provides a sensitive measure of non-adherence that predicts viral rebound.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨纵向自我报告的依从性数据对病毒反弹的预测价值。

方法

瑞士HIV队列研究中,过去3个月接受联合抗逆转录病毒疗法(cART)且RNA<50拷贝/毫升、在2007年3月1日前至少接受过一次依从性访谈的个体符合条件。依从性根据过去28天漏服cART的剂量(0、1、2或>2剂)来定义。病毒反弹定义为RNA>500拷贝/毫升。使用具有时间独立和时间依赖协变量的Cox回归模型评估病毒反弹时间。

结果

共纳入2664名个体和15530次访视。在所有访视中,漏服剂量报告如下:1剂14.7%,2剂5.1%,>2剂3.8%,服用剂量<95% 4.5%,连续漏服≥2剂3.2%。共有308名(11.6%)患者出现病毒反弹。在控制混杂变量后,自我报告的不依从性仍与病毒反弹发生率显著相关(与零漏服剂量相比:1剂,风险比[HR] 1.03,95%置信区间[CI] 0.72 - 1.48;2剂,HR 2.17,95% CI 1.46 - 3.25;>2剂,HR 3.66,95% CI 2.50 - 5.34)。确定了几个与病毒反弹风险增加显著相关的变量,无论依从性如何:使用蛋白酶抑制剂或三联核苷方案(与非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂相比),既往cART方案>5种,看诊经验较少的医生,服用联合药物,以及病毒抑制时间较短。

结论

反复使用的简单自我报告依从性问卷可提供一种敏感的不依从性测量方法,预测病毒反弹。

相似文献

1
Self-reported non-adherence to antiretroviral therapy repeatedly assessed by two questions predicts treatment failure in virologically suppressed patients.通过两个问题反复评估的自我报告的抗逆转录病毒治疗不依从性可预测病毒学抑制患者的治疗失败。
Antivir Ther. 2008;13(1):77-85.
2
Long-term utility of measuring adherence by self-report compared with pharmacy record in a routine clinic setting.在常规门诊环境中,通过自我报告与药房记录来测量依从性的长期效用比较。
HIV Med. 2005 Sep;6(5):366-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2005.00322.x.
3
Similar adherence rates favor different virologic outcomes for patients treated with nonnucleoside analogues or protease inhibitors.相似的依从率对接受非核苷类似物或蛋白酶抑制剂治疗的患者产生不同的病毒学结果。
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jan 1;40(1):158-63. doi: 10.1086/426595. Epub 2004 Dec 6.
4
Does less frequent routine monitoring of patients on a stable, fully suppressed cART regimen lead to an increased risk of treatment failure?对于接受稳定、完全抑制的抗逆转录病毒治疗(cART)方案的患者,减少常规监测的频率是否会导致治疗失败风险增加?
AIDS. 2008 Nov 12;22(17):2381-90. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e328317a6eb.
5
Determinants of virological failure after successful viral load suppression in first-line highly active antiretroviral therapy.一线高效抗逆转录病毒治疗中病毒载量成功抑制后病毒学失败的决定因素。
Antivir Ther. 2008;13(7):927-36.
6
'Simply forgot' is the most frequently stated reason for missed doses of HAART irrespective of degree of adherence.无论依从程度如何,“只是忘记了”是漏服高效抗逆转录病毒治疗药物最常提及的原因。
HIV Med. 2006 Jul;7(5):285-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2006.00387.x.
7
Use of a prescription-based measure of antiretroviral therapy adherence to predict viral rebound in HIV-infected individuals with viral suppression.使用基于处方的抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性测量来预测病毒抑制的 HIV 感染者中的病毒反弹。
HIV Med. 2010 Mar;11(3):216-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1293.2009.00771.x. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
8
The correlation between plasma concentrations of protease inhibitors, medication adherence and virological outcome in HIV-infected patients.HIV感染患者中蛋白酶抑制剂血浆浓度、服药依从性与病毒学转归之间的相关性。
Antivir Ther. 2004 Oct;9(5):753-61.
9
A time-to-prescription-refill measure of antiretroviral adherence predicted changes in viral load in HIV.抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性的处方再填充时间指标可预测HIV病毒载量的变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;57(10):1107-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.002.
10
Relative prognostic value of self-reported adherence and plasma NNRTI/PI concentrations to predict virological rebound in patients initially responding to HAART.自我报告的依从性和血浆非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂/蛋白酶抑制剂浓度对预测初始接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗有反应患者病毒学反弹的相对预后价值。
Antivir Ther. 2004 Apr;9(2):291-6.

引用本文的文献

1
HIV-1 Low-Level Viremia Predicts Viral Failure in Participants on Antiretroviral Therapy in the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.在瑞士HIV队列研究中,HIV-1低水平病毒血症可预测接受抗逆转录病毒治疗参与者的病毒学失败。
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Aug 1;81(1):57-66. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae569.
2
Patient-reported outcome measures to detect intentional, mixed, or unintentional non-adherence to medication: a systematic review.患者报告结局测量用于检测故意、混合或非故意的药物不依从:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 19;12(9):e057868. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057868.
3
Detecting, preventing and treating non-adherence to immunosuppression after kidney transplantation.
肾移植后免疫抑制治疗不依从性的检测、预防及处理
Clin Kidney J. 2022 Jan 14;15(7):1253-1274. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac017. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Examination of Positive Health Check: Implementation Results From a Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Trial.纵向混合方法研究积极健康检查:1 型有效性-实施混合试验的实施结果。
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2022 Sep 1;91(1):47-57. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003018. Epub 2022 May 18.
5
Prediction-driven pooled testing methods: Application to HIV treatment monitoring in Rakai, Uganda.预测驱动的合并检测方法:在乌干达拉凯的 HIV 治疗监测中的应用。
Stat Med. 2021 Aug 30;40(19):4185-4199. doi: 10.1002/sim.9022. Epub 2021 May 28.
6
Association of Incomplete Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy With Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Virologically Suppressed Persons With HIV: The Swiss HIV Cohort Study.在病毒学抑制的HIV感染者中,抗逆转录病毒治疗不完全依从性与心血管事件及死亡率的关联:瑞士HIV队列研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Jan 21;8(2):ofab032. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab032. eCollection 2021 Feb.
7
An instrument to assess HIV-related knowledge and adjustment to HIV+ status, and their association with anti-retroviral adherence.一种评估与 HIV 相关的知识和对 HIV+状态的调整的工具,以及它们与抗逆转录病毒依从性的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 22;15(6):e0227722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227722. eCollection 2020.
8
Adherence to HIV treatment regimens: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.艾滋病病毒治疗方案的依从性:系统文献综述与荟萃分析。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019 Apr 3;13:475-490. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S192735. eCollection 2019.
9
Understanding Medication Nonadherence after Kidney Transplant.肾移植后药物治疗不依从性的理解
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Aug;28(8):2290-2301. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017020216. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Differentiated Human Immunodeficiency Virus RNA Monitoring in Resource-Limited Settings: An Economic Analysis.资源有限环境下的差异化人类免疫缺陷病毒RNA监测:一项经济分析
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 15;64(12):1724-1730. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix177.