Carabin Hélène, Edmunds W John
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA.
J Infect Dis. 2003 May 15;187 Suppl 1:S29-35. doi: 10.1086/368038.
Estimates are made of monetary savings associated with measles eradication in seven industrialized countries. Three scenarios were studied: First, changing from the present two-dose measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) immunization schedule to one-dose of MMR; second, the use of an MMR and mumps-rubella schedule; or third, continuing the present schedule. Results show that the largest savings (US $623 million) would be achieved by changing to a one-dose MMR schedule with an assumption of a 3% discount rate and measles eradication in 2010. The smallest overall savings would result from option 3, by use of a 5% discount rate and the assumption that measles eradication occurs in 2020 ($10 million). These savings are less than previously estimated for the United States, partly because of the assumption that measles vaccines will continue to be delivered in response to possible bioterrorism threats.
对七个工业化国家与消除麻疹相关的资金节省情况进行了估算。研究了三种方案:第一,从目前的两剂麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹(MMR)免疫接种计划改为一剂MMR;第二,采用MMR和腮腺炎-风疹计划;或者第三,维持目前的计划。结果显示,假设贴现率为3%且2010年实现麻疹消除,改为一剂MMR计划将实现最大节省(6.23亿美元)。方案3,采用5%的贴现率并假设2020年实现麻疹消除,总体节省最小(1000万美元)。这些节省低于此前美国的估计,部分原因是假设麻疹疫苗将继续用于应对可能的生物恐怖主义威胁。