Suppr超能文献

传递性、灵活性、联合表征与海马体。I. 实证分析。

Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations, and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis.

作者信息

Van Elzakker Michael, O'Reilly Randall C, Rudy Jerry W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.

出版信息

Hippocampus. 2003;13(3):334-40. doi: 10.1002/hipo.10083.

Abstract

After training on a set of four ordered, simultaneous, odor discrimination problems (A+B-, B+C-, C+D-, D+E), intact rats display transitivity: When tested on the novel combination BD, they choose B. Rats with damage to the hippocampus, however, do not show transitivity (Dusek and Eichenbaum, 1997. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:7109-7114). These results have been interpreted as support for the idea that the hippocampus is a relational memory storage system that enables the subject to make comparisons among representations of the individual problems and choose based on inferential logic. We provide evidence for a simpler explanation. Specifically, subjects make their choices based on the absolute excitatory value of the individual stimuli. This value determines the ability of that stimulus to attract a response. This conclusion emerged because after training on a five-problem set (A+B-, B+C-, C+D-, D+E-, E+F-) rats preferred B when tested with BE, but not when tested with BD. The implication of these results for how to conceptualize the role of the hippocampus in transitive-like phenomena is discussed.

摘要

在一组四个有序、同时进行的气味辨别问题(A+B-、B+C-、C+D-、D+E)上进行训练后,未受损的大鼠表现出传递性:当在新组合BD上进行测试时,它们选择B。然而,海马体受损的大鼠则不表现出传递性(Dusek和Eichenbaum,1997年。《美国国家科学院院刊》94:7109 - 7114)。这些结果被解释为支持这样一种观点,即海马体是一个关系记忆存储系统,使主体能够在各个问题的表征之间进行比较,并基于推理逻辑进行选择。我们提供了一个更简单解释的证据。具体来说,主体根据单个刺激的绝对兴奋性值做出选择。这个值决定了该刺激吸引反应的能力。得出这个结论是因为在一组五个问题(A+B-、B+C-、C+D-、D+E-、E+F-)上进行训练后,大鼠在接受BE测试时更喜欢B,但在接受BD测试时则不然。本文讨论了这些结果对于如何理解海马体在类似传递性现象中的作用的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验