Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, Garvey T, Jhanjee R, Sechriest V
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455, USA.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):773-81. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00001.
To our knowledge, a prospective, randomized study comparing operative and nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture in patients without a neurological deficit has never been performed. Our hypothesis was that operative treatment would lead to superior long-term clinical outcomes.
From 1994 to 1998, forty-seven consecutive patients (thirty-two men and fifteen women) with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and no neurological deficit were randomized to one of two treatment groups: operative (posterior or anterior arthrodesis and instrumentation) or nonoperative treatment (application of a body cast or orthosis). Radiographs and computed tomography scans were analyzed for sagittal alignment and canal compromise. All patients completed a questionnaire to assess any disability they may have had before the injury, and they indicated the degree of pain at the time of presentation with use of a visual analog scale. The average duration of follow-up was forty-four months (minimum, twenty-four months). After treatment, patients indicated the degree of pain with use of the visual analog scale and they completed the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire, the Oswestry back-pain questionnaire, and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey.
In the operative group (twenty-four patients), the average fracture kyphosis was 10.1 degrees at the time of admission and 13 degrees at the final follow-up evaluation. The average canal compromise was 39% on admission, and it improved to 22% at the final follow-up examination. In the nonoperative group (twenty-three patients), the average kyphosis was 11.3 degrees at the time of admission and 13.8 degrees at the final follow-up examination after treatment. The average canal compromise was 34% at the time of admission and improved to 19% at the final follow-up examination. On the basis of the numbers available, no significant difference was found between the two groups with respect to return to work. The average pain scores at the time of the latest follow-up were similar for both groups. The preinjury scores were similar for both groups; however, at the time of the final follow-up, those who were treated nonoperatively reported less disability. Final scores on the SF-36 and Oswestry questionnaires were similar for the two groups, although certain trends favored those treated without surgery. Complications were more frequent in the operative group.
We found that operative treatment of patients with a stable thoracolumbar burst fracture and normal findings on the neurological examination provided no major long-term advantage compared with nonoperative treatment.
据我们所知,此前从未进行过一项前瞻性随机研究,比较无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者的手术治疗与非手术治疗效果。我们的假设是手术治疗能带来更优的长期临床结果。
1994年至1998年,连续纳入47例(32例男性和15例女性)胸腰椎稳定性爆裂骨折且无神经功能缺损的患者,随机分为两个治疗组之一:手术组(后路或前路融合及内固定)或非手术组(使用石膏背心或矫形器)。对X线片和计算机断层扫描进行矢状位对线和椎管占位分析。所有患者均完成一份问卷,以评估受伤前可能存在的任何残疾情况,并使用视觉模拟量表表明就诊时的疼痛程度。平均随访时间为44个月(最短24个月)。治疗后,患者使用视觉模拟量表表明疼痛程度,并完成罗兰和莫里斯残疾问卷、奥斯威斯尔背痛问卷以及简短健康调查36项量表(SF-36)。
手术组(24例患者)入院时平均骨折后凸角度为10.1度,末次随访评估时为13度。入院时平均椎管占位为39%,末次随访检查时改善至22%。非手术组(23例患者)入院时平均后凸角度为11.3度,治疗后末次随访检查时为13.8度。入院时平均椎管占位为34%,末次随访检查时改善至19%。根据现有数据,两组在恢复工作方面未发现显著差异。两组最近一次随访时的平均疼痛评分相似。两组受伤前评分相似;然而,在末次随访时,接受非手术治疗的患者报告的残疾程度较轻。两组SF-36和奥斯威斯尔问卷的最终评分相似,尽管某些趋势显示非手术治疗的患者更具优势。手术组并发症更常见。
我们发现,对于胸腰椎稳定性爆裂骨折且神经学检查结果正常的患者,与非手术治疗相比,手术治疗并无显著的长期优势。