• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于视觉单词识别中拼字邻域效应的磁刺激检查。

A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.

作者信息

Lavidor Michal, Walsh Vincent

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Hull, England.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;15(3):354-63. doi: 10.1162/089892903321593081.

DOI:10.1162/089892903321593081
PMID:12729488
Abstract

The split-fovea theory proposes that visual word recognition is mediated by the splitting of the foveal image, with letters to the left of fixation projected to the right hemisphere (RH) and letters to the right of fixation projected to the left hemisphere (LH). We applied repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the left and right occipital cortex during a lexical decision task to investigate the extent to which word recognition processes could be accounted for according to the split-fovea theory. Unilateral rTMS significantly impaired lexical decision latencies to centrally presented words, supporting the suggestion that foveal representation of words is split between the cerebral hemispheres rather than bilateral. Behaviorally, we showed that words that have many orthographic neighbors sharing the same initial letters ("lead neighbors") facilitated lexical decision more than words with few lead neighbors. This effect did not apply to end neighbors (orthographic neighbors sharing the same final letters). Crucially, rTMS over the RH impaired lead-, but not end-neighborhood facilitation. The results support the split-fovea theory, where the RH has primacy in representing lead neighbors of a written word.

摘要

中央凹分裂理论提出,视觉单词识别是由中央凹图像的分裂介导的,注视点左侧的字母投射到右半球(RH),注视点右侧的字母投射到左半球(LH)。我们在词汇判断任务中对左、右枕叶皮质施加重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),以研究根据中央凹分裂理论,单词识别过程在多大程度上可以得到解释。单侧rTMS显著延长了对中央呈现单词的词汇判断潜伏期,支持了单词的中央凹表征在大脑半球之间分裂而非双侧性的观点。在行为方面,我们发现,有许多共享相同首字母的正字法邻词(“首字母邻词”)的单词比首字母邻词少的单词更能促进词汇判断。这种效应不适用于尾字母邻词(共享相同尾字母的正字法邻词)。至关重要的是,对右半球施加rTMS会损害首字母邻词的促进作用,但不会损害尾字母邻词的促进作用。这些结果支持了中央凹分裂理论,即右半球在表征书面单词的首字母邻词方面具有首要地位。

相似文献

1
A magnetic stimulation examination of orthographic neighborhood effects in visual word recognition.一项关于视觉单词识别中拼字邻域效应的磁刺激检查。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Apr 1;15(3):354-63. doi: 10.1162/089892903321593081.
2
Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition: effects of orthographic neighborhood size.评估视觉单词识别的分割加工模型:正字法邻域大小的影响。
Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):312-20. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00164-0.
3
Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.评估视觉单词识别的分裂中央凹模型:两个视野以及中央凹呈现单词的左右半部分中大小写交替的影响。
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(8):1128-37. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.11.022. Epub 2005 Jan 16.
4
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.重新评估单词识别中的中央凹分裂加工:单词长度的影响。
Cortex. 2009 Apr;45(4):495-505. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.007. Epub 2008 Feb 11.
5
Magnetic stimulation studies of foveal representation.中央凹表征的磁刺激研究。
Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):331-8. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00167-6.
6
Split fovea theory and the role of the two cerebral hemispheres in reading: a review of the evidence.分视野理论和大脑两半球在阅读中的作用:对证据的综述。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(2):353-65. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.021. Epub 2009 Aug 29.
7
Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.长度、格式、相邻关系、半球,以及向一侧呈现或在注视点呈现的单词的处理。
Brain Lang. 2004 Mar;88(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00166-4.
8
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of retinal eccentricity on hemispheric dominance.重新评估单词识别中的中央凹分裂加工:视网膜离心率对半球优势的影响。
Neuropsychology. 2008 Nov;22(6):738-45. doi: 10.1037/a0013140.
9
How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.视觉单词识别中的半球间交流是如何起作用的?在裂中央凹理论的早期和晚期整合观点之间做出抉择。
Brain Lang. 2009 Feb;108(2):112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
10
Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length during monocular viewing.重新评估单眼阅读过程中字词识别的裂脑加工:字词长度的影响。
Cortex. 2010 Jan;46(1):100-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.008. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Neuromodulatory effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on language performance in healthy participants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.经颅磁刺激对健康受试者语言能力的神经调节作用:系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Dec 5;16:1027446. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.1027446. eCollection 2022.
2
The Impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Reading Processes: A Systematic Review.经颅磁刺激对阅读过程的影响:系统评价。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Mar;33(1):255-277. doi: 10.1007/s11065-022-09534-7. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
3
Functional foveal splitting: evidence from neuropsychological and multimodal MRI investigations in a Chinese patient with a splenium lesion.
功能性黄斑分裂:一例胼胝体病变患者的神经心理学和多模态 MRI 研究证据。
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023997. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
4
Convergence of the visual field split: hemispheric modeling of face and object recognition.视野分裂的汇聚:面部和物体识别的半球模型
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2298-307. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20162.
5
Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition.阅读中中央凹分裂的神经关联:来自汉字识别ERP研究的证据。
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 25;45(6):1280-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
6
Magnetic stimulation and the crossed-uncrossed difference (CUD) paradigm: selective effects in the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres.磁刺激与交叉-非交叉差异(CUD)范式:同侧和对侧半球的选择性效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Jan;160(3):404-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-004-2166-9. Epub 2004 Nov 30.