Suppr超能文献

视野分裂的汇聚:面部和物体识别的半球模型

Convergence of the visual field split: hemispheric modeling of face and object recognition.

作者信息

Hsiao Janet Hui-wen, Shieh Danke X, Cottrell Garrison W

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0404, USA.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2298-307. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20162.

Abstract

Anatomical evidence shows that our visual field is initially split along the vertical midline and contralaterally projected to different hemispheres. It remains unclear at which processing stage the split information converges. In the current study, we applied the Double Filtering by Frequency (DFF) theory (Ivry & Robertson, 1998) to modeling the visual field split; the theory assumes a right-hemisphere/low-frequency bias. We compared three cognitive architectures with different timings of convergence and examined their cognitive plausibility to account for the left-side bias effect in face perception observed in human data. We show that the early convergence model failed to show the left-side bias effect. The modeling, hence, suggests that the convergence may take place at an intermediate or late stage, at least after information has been extracted/encoded separately in the two hemispheres, a fact that is often overlooked in computational modeling of cognitive processes. Comparative anatomical data suggest that this separate encoding process that results in differential frequency biases in the two hemispheres may be engaged from V1 up to the level of area V3a and V4v, and converge at least after the lateral occipital region. The left-side bias effect in our model was also observed in Greeble recognition; the modeling, hence, also provides testable predictions about whether the left-side bias effect may also be observed in (expertise-level) object recognition.

摘要

解剖学证据表明,我们的视野最初是沿着垂直中线分开的,并对侧投射到不同的半球。目前尚不清楚分开的信息在哪个处理阶段会汇聚。在当前的研究中,我们应用了频率双重过滤(DFF)理论(Ivry & Robertson,1998)来对视野分割进行建模;该理论假设存在右半球/低频偏向。我们比较了三种具有不同汇聚时间的认知架构,并检验了它们在解释人类数据中面部感知的左侧偏向效应方面的认知合理性。我们发现早期汇聚模型未能显示出左侧偏向效应。因此,该建模表明汇聚可能发生在中间或后期阶段,至少是在信息已经在两个半球中分别提取/编码之后,而这一事实在认知过程的计算建模中常常被忽视。比较解剖学数据表明,这种导致两个半球频率偏向不同的单独编码过程可能从V1一直持续到V3a和V4v区域的水平,并至少在枕叶外侧区域之后汇聚。我们的模型中的左侧偏向效应在 Greeble 识别中也被观察到;因此,该建模还提供了关于在(专业水平的)物体识别中是否也可能观察到左侧偏向效应的可测试预测。

相似文献

1
Convergence of the visual field split: hemispheric modeling of face and object recognition.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Dec;20(12):2298-307. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20162.
2
Concurrent processing of spatial relations and objects in two cerebral hemispheres.
Percept Mot Skills. 2001 Apr;92(2):335-47. doi: 10.2466/pms.2001.92.2.335.
3
The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
Neuropsychologia. 2008 Nov;46(13):3061-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.06.017. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
4
Hemispheric asymmetry in holistic processing of words.
Laterality. 2019 Jan;24(1):98-112. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1475483. Epub 2018 May 13.
6
Perceptual asymmetries in greyscales: object-based versus space-based influences.
Cortex. 2012 May;48(5):553-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.015. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
7
Retinotopic and lateralized processing of spatial frequencies in human visual cortex during scene categorization.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Aug;25(8):1315-31. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00397. Epub 2013 Apr 11.
10
Decoding facial blends of emotion: visual field, attentional and hemispheric biases.
Brain Cogn. 2013 Dec;83(3):252-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating interhemispheric connectivity during midline object recognition using EEG.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 26;17(8):e0270949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270949. eCollection 2022.
2
The left-side bias is not unique to own-race face processing.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1562-1570. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02264-7. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
4
An fMRI study of visual hemifield integration and cerebral lateralization.
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Jun;100:35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Why is the fusiform face area recruited for novel categories of expertise? A neurocomputational investigation.
Brain Res. 2008 Apr 2;1202:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.079. Epub 2007 Jul 26.
2
Dynamics of visual information integration in the brain for categorizing facial expressions.
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 18;17(18):1580-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.048.
3
Neural correlates of foveal splitting in reading: evidence from an ERP study of Chinese character recognition.
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Mar 25;45(6):1280-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.001. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
4
A TMS examination of semantic radical combinability effects in Chinese character recognition.
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):159-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.072. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
5
Foveal splitting causes differential processing of Chinese orthography in the male and female brain.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Oct;25(2):531-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Sep 8.
6
Perceptual asymmetries are preserved in memory for highly familiar faces of self and friend.
Brain Cogn. 2005 Aug;58(3):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.01.001.
7
Receptive fields for flexible face categorizations.
Psychol Sci. 2004 Nov;15(11):753-61. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00752.x.
8
The nature of foveal representation.
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Sep;5(9):729-35. doi: 10.1038/nrn1498.
10
Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex.
Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20(3):1609-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.010.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验