• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染对关键卫生经济结果的影响:缩短住院时间重要吗?

Impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections on key health economic outcomes: does reducing the length of hospital stay matter?

作者信息

Nathwani Dilip

机构信息

Ninewells Hospital, Tayside University Hospitals, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 May;51 Suppl 2:ii37-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg250.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkg250
PMID:12730141
Abstract

The clinical and economic impact of methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections on the patient, the hospital and the community is significant and continues to increase. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, in particular, represent a substantial burden of resistant infections in the hospital. As such, it is important to analyse the cost parameters associated with an episode of infection. Key determinants of the total cost of an episode of infection include fixed costs and hotel costs; the contribution of antimicrobial therapy, including drug acquisition and delivery costs, is comparatively marginal. Therefore, decreasing the hospital length of stay by promoting earlier hospital discharge will significantly reduce overall costs and, in effect, increase the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the hospital. Linezolid, the first marketed agent of a new class of oxazolidinone antibiotics, is effective in the treatment of serious Gram-positive infections. Its availability in both intravenous (iv) and oral formulations (the latter of which is 100% bioavailable) facilitates early discharge from hospital. Hospitalized patients with methicillin-resistant staphylococcal infections who were treated with either linezolid or vancomycin demonstrated no significant differences in clinical outcome or mortality. However, compared with vancomycin, administration of linezolid reduced the duration of iv therapy and increased the chance of being discharged during the first week of hospitalization. These effects were most pronounced in the subset of patients with skin and soft tissue infections. Knowledge of these data may influence prescribing practices at the individual and organizational levels and, in turn, reduce the economic burden associated with MRSS infections.

摘要

耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌感染对患者、医院和社区造成的临床和经济影响重大,且仍在不断增加。特别是耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染,在医院耐药感染中占相当大的比重。因此,分析与感染发作相关的成本参数很重要。感染发作总成本的关键决定因素包括固定成本和住院费用;抗菌治疗的贡献,包括药品采购和配送成本,相对较小。因此,通过促进提前出院来缩短住院时间将显著降低总体成本,实际上还能提高医院的效率和成本效益。利奈唑胺是新型恶唑烷酮类抗生素中首个上市的药物,对治疗严重革兰氏阳性菌感染有效。其静脉注射(iv)和口服制剂(后者生物利用度为100%)均有供应,便于患者早日出院。接受利奈唑胺或万古霉素治疗的耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌感染住院患者,在临床结局或死亡率方面无显著差异。然而,与万古霉素相比,使用利奈唑胺可缩短静脉治疗时间,并增加住院第一周内出院的机会。这些效果在皮肤和软组织感染患者亚组中最为明显。了解这些数据可能会影响个人和组织层面的处方行为,进而减轻与耐甲氧西林葡萄球菌感染相关的经济负担。

相似文献

1
Impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections on key health economic outcomes: does reducing the length of hospital stay matter?耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染对关键卫生经济结果的影响:缩短住院时间重要吗?
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 May;51 Suppl 2:ii37-44. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg250.
2
Impact of linezolid on economic outcomes and determinants of cost in a clinical trial evaluating patients with MRSA complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.在一项评估耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)复杂性皮肤和软组织感染患者的临床试验中,利奈唑胺对经济结果及成本决定因素的影响。
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;40(6):1017-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G728. Epub 2006 May 23.
3
Linezolid reduces length of stay and duration of intravenous treatment compared with vancomycin for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).与万古霉素相比,利奈唑胺可缩短因疑似或确诊的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)引起的复杂性皮肤及软组织感染患者的住院时间和静脉治疗时长。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2005 Dec;26(6):442-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2005.09.003. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
4
[Linezolid in the treatment of antibiotic-resistant gram-positive infections of the musculoskeletal system].利奈唑胺治疗肌肉骨骼系统耐抗生素革兰氏阳性菌感染
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006 Oct;73(5):329-33.
5
Clinical and economic outcomes of oral linezolid versus intravenous vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA-complicated, lower-extremity skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.口服利奈唑胺与静脉注射万古霉素治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌所致耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌复杂性下肢皮肤和软组织感染的临床及经济学结果
Am J Surg. 2005 Apr;189(4):425-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.01.011.
6
The importance of tissue penetration in achieving successful antimicrobial treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and complicated skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: vancomycin and linezolid.组织穿透性在实现耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的医院获得性肺炎和复杂性皮肤软组织感染的成功抗菌治疗中的重要性:万古霉素和利奈唑胺。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Mar;26(3):571-88. doi: 10.1185/03007990903512057.
7
Effects of linezolid on hospital length of stay compared with vancomycin in treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus infections. An application of multivariate survival analysis.利奈唑胺与万古霉素相比治疗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染时对住院时间的影响。多变量生存分析的应用。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Summer;18(3):540-54.
8
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid versus vancomycin for hospitalized patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections in France.法国住院复杂性皮肤及软组织感染患者使用利奈唑胺与万古霉素的成本效益分析
Med Mal Infect. 2009 May;39(5):330-40. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Mar 21.
9
Linezolid to decrease length of stay in the hospital for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Jan 1;36(1):124; author reply 124-5. doi: 10.1086/345300.
10
Cost-effectiveness of linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of surgical site infections.利奈唑胺与万古霉素治疗手术部位感染的成本效益分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jan;23(1):185-93. doi: 10.1185/030079906X162700.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-minimisation analysis of oritavancin for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections from a United Kingdom perspective.从英国角度看,替加环素治疗急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的成本最小化分析。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Nov;23(8):1371-1381. doi: 10.1007/s10198-022-01432-2. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
2
Risk of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus prosthetic joint infection in elective total hip and knee arthroplasty following eradication therapy.根除治疗后择期全髋关节和膝关节置换术中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌假体关节感染的风险
World J Orthop. 2021 Nov 18;12(11):842-849. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i11.842.
3
Ward-level factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus acquisition-an electronic medical records study in Singapore.
与耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌获得相关的病房级因素-新加坡电子病历研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0254852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254852. eCollection 2021.
4
Pediatric Septic Arthritis and Osteomyelitis in the USA: A National KID Database Analysis.美国儿童化脓性关节炎和骨髓炎:一项全国儿童数据库分析
HSS J. 2019 Jul;15(2):159-166. doi: 10.1007/s11420-018-9644-2. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
5
Profile of a Novel Anionic Fluoroquinolone-Delafloxacin.一种新型的阴离子氟喹诺酮类药物——德拉沙星的特性。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Apr 8;68(Suppl 3):S213-S222. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy1079.
6
Minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from different clinical samples at a tertiary care hospital in Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级护理医院中,从不同临床样本分离出的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对万古霉素的最低抑菌浓度
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2016 Jul 21;5:27. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0126-3. eCollection 2016.
7
Examination of hospital length of stay in Canada among patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.对加拿大耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起的急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染患者的住院时间进行检查。
Infect Drug Resist. 2016 Jan 28;9:19-33. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S93112. eCollection 2016.
8
An open-label, pragmatic, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of daptomycin versus vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infection.一项开放标签、实用性、随机对照临床试验,以评估达托霉素与万古霉素治疗复杂性皮肤和皮肤结构感染的相对疗效。
BMC Infect Dis. 2015 Nov 7;15:503. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1261-9.
9
A cost-benefit analysis of twice-daily consultant ward rounds and clinical input on investigation and pharmacy costs in a major teaching hospital in the UK.英国一家大型教学医院每日两次的会诊病房查房以及临床投入对检查和药房成本的成本效益分析。
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 8;5(4):e007367. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007367.
10
Antibacterial Treatment of Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections: a Cost and Budget Impact Analysis in Greek Hospitals.金黄色葡萄球菌引起的耐甲氧西林皮肤和软组织感染的抗菌治疗:希腊医院的成本和预算影响分析。
Infect Dis Ther. 2014 Dec;3(2):257-68. doi: 10.1007/s40121-014-0044-8. Epub 2014 Oct 7.