Sorensen James L, Dilley James, London Julie, Okin Robert L, Delucchi Kevin L, Phibbs Ciaran S
Department of Psychiatry, San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29(1):133-50. doi: 10.1081/ada-120018843.
In a random assignment study, substance-abusing patients with HIV/AIDS in a public general hospital received a brief contact condition or received 12 months of case management delivered by paraprofessionals. Patient outcomes included substance use, HIV transmission risk, physical health, psychological status, and quality of living situation. In both conditions, a significant decrease occurred in a range of problems from Intake to the 6-month interview, followed by no significant pattern of change at 12- and 18-month interviews. On major outcome variables, there were no significant differences between the brief contact and case management conditions. Sixteen percent had died by the 18-month interview. Process data indicated wide variation in the amount of case management received by participants, and the amount of case management was not related to improvement in the outcome measures. The study has limitations yet does not support the hypothesis that case management improves outcomes better than brief contact for this population.
在一项随机分配研究中,一家公立综合医院中滥用药物的艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者被分配到简短接触组,或接受由辅助专业人员提供的为期12个月的病例管理。患者的治疗结果包括药物使用情况、艾滋病毒传播风险、身体健康状况、心理状态和生活质量。在这两种情况下,从入院到6个月访谈期间,一系列问题都有显著减少,而在12个月和18个月访谈时则没有显著的变化模式。在主要结果变量方面,简短接触组和病例管理组之间没有显著差异。到18个月访谈时,16%的患者已经死亡。过程数据表明,参与者接受的病例管理量差异很大,且病例管理量与结果指标的改善无关。该研究有局限性,但并不支持病例管理比简短接触能更好地改善该人群治疗结果的假设。