• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

引入外倒转术常规操作以处理足月时胎位异常的胎儿。

Introducing routine external cephalic version for the management of the malpresenting fetus near term.

作者信息

Devendra K

机构信息

Division of Fetal-Maternal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore 169608.

出版信息

Med J Malaysia. 2002 Dec;57(4):454-9.

PMID:12733170
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of external cephalic version (ECV) when its use was introduced in the routine management of breech presentation and transverse lie after 36 weeks by obstetricians with limited prior experience with the procedure. The influence of various factors on the outcome of ECV was also studied.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 44 consecutive cases of ECV which were analysed with respect to outcome, parity, type of breech, placental site and birth weight.

RESULTS

ECV was successful in 45% of women, 80% of women with successful ECV delivered vaginally while 10% underwent spontaneous reversion to a non-cephalic presentation. In contrast, only 15% of women with failed ECV delivered vaginally. Parity, type of breech presentation and placental location did not significantly affect the outcome of ECV although there was a trend towards better success rate of ECV with multiparity, flexed breech presentation, transverse lie and posteriorly-located placentae. The mean birth weight of fetuses of women with successful ECV was significantly heavier than those of women who failed ECV (p < 0.001). No significant fetal or maternal morbidity occurred as a result of ECV in this study.

CONCLUSION

ECV is a safe and effective procedure that is useful in the management of breech presentation and transverse lie near term. The lack of prior experience with the procedure does not appear to influence the success rate or morbidity.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估在孕周36周后,由经验有限的产科医生将外倒转术(ECV)引入臀位和横位的常规管理时的有效性和安全性。还研究了各种因素对ECV结果的影响。

方法

对44例连续的ECV病例进行回顾性研究,分析其结果、产次、臀位类型、胎盘位置和出生体重。

结果

45%的女性ECV成功,ECV成功的女性中有80%经阴道分娩,10%自行恢复为非头位。相比之下,ECV失败的女性中只有15%经阴道分娩。产次、臀位类型和胎盘位置对ECV的结果没有显著影响,尽管经产妇、屈曲型臀位、横位和胎盘后置的ECV成功率有升高趋势。ECV成功的女性所生胎儿的平均出生体重显著高于ECV失败的女性(p < 0.001)。本研究中,ECV未导致显著的胎儿或母体并发症。

结论

ECV是一种安全有效的方法,对足月臀位和横位的管理有用。缺乏该手术的既往经验似乎不会影响成功率或并发症发生率。

相似文献

1
Introducing routine external cephalic version for the management of the malpresenting fetus near term.引入外倒转术常规操作以处理足月时胎位异常的胎儿。
Med J Malaysia. 2002 Dec;57(4):454-9.
2
External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.使用沙丁胺醇进行外倒转术——成功率及成功的预测因素
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2009 Feb;19(2):91-4.
3
Safety and efficacy of external cephalic version for women with a previous cesarean delivery.既往有剖宫产史女性行外倒转术的安全性和有效性。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 Feb;142(2):111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
4
Efficacy of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy.妊娠晚期应用宫缩抑制剂行外倒转术的疗效
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Jan;91(1):19-24.
5
[Fewer breech deliveries after implementation of a modified cephalic version protocol].[实施改良头位转位方案后臀位分娩减少]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2010;154:A63.
6
[External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].[足月臀位外倒转术:降低剖宫产率的有效方法]
Minerva Ginecol. 2003 Dec;55(6):519-24.
7
[External cephalic version as a possible treatment of breech presentation].[外倒转术作为臀先露的一种可能治疗方法]
Minerva Ginecol. 2000 Jun;52(6):221-7.
8
Employing nifedipine as a tocolytic agent prior to external cephalic version.在进行外倒转术之前使用硝苯地平作为宫缩抑制剂。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(4):434-7. doi: 10.1080/00016340801996598.
9
A retrospective study of the success, safety and effectiveness of external cephalic version without tocolysis in a specialised midwifery centre in the Netherlands.荷兰一家专业助产中心关于不使用宫缩抑制剂进行外倒转术的成功率、安全性及有效性的回顾性研究。
Midwifery. 2008 Mar;24(1):38-45. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
10
External cephalic version in singleton pregnancies at term: a retrospective analysis.足月单胎妊娠的外倒转术:一项回顾性分析
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2008;66(1):18-21. doi: 10.1159/000114251. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
A prospective study using an individualized nomogram to predict the success rate of external cephalic version.采用个体化列线图预测外倒转术成功率的前瞻性研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 12;12(1):11795. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16112-7.
2
External cephalic version for breech presentation at term.足月臀位的外倒转术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 1;2015(4):CD000083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub3.
3
Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis.外倒转术的椎管内阻滞:成本分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Jul;41(7):1023-31. doi: 10.1111/jog.12674. Epub 2015 Mar 15.
4
Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation.外倒转术用于足月臀位分娩的成本效益分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Jan 21;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-3.