Suppr超能文献

用于麻风病患者分类及识别有患麻风病高风险接触者的简单快速侧向流动检测。

Simple and fast lateral flow test for classification of leprosy patients and identification of contacts with high risk of developing leprosy.

作者信息

Bührer-Sékula S, Smits H L, Gussenhoven G C, van Leeuwen J, Amador S, Fujiwara T, Klatser P R, Oskam L

机构信息

KIT (Royal Tropical Institute) Biomedical Research, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2003 May;41(5):1991-5. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.1991-1995.2003.

Abstract

The interruption of leprosy transmission is one of the main challenges for leprosy control programs since no consistent evidence exists that transmission has been reduced after the introduction of multidrug therapy. Sources of infection are primarily people with high loads of bacteria with or without clinical signs of leprosy. The availability of a simple test system for the detection of antibodies to phenolic glycolipid-I (PGL-I) of Mycobacterium leprae to identify these individuals may be important in the prevention of transmission. We have developed a lateral flow assay, the ML Flow test, for the detection of antibodies to PGL-I which takes only 10 min to perform. An agreement of 91% was observed between enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and our test; the agreement beyond chance (kappa value) was 0.77. We evaluated the use of whole blood by comparing 539 blood and serum samples from an area of high endemicity. The observed agreement was 85.9% (kappa = 0.70). Storage of the lateral flow test and the running buffer at 28 degrees C for up to 1 year did not influence the results of the assay. The sensitivity of the ML Flow test in correctly classifying MB patients was 97.4%. The specificity of the ML Flow test, based on the results of the control group, was 90.2%. The ML Flow test is a fast and easy-to-perform method for the detection of immunoglobulin M antibodies to PGL-I of M. leprae. It does not require any special equipment, and the highly stable reagents make the test robust and suitable for use in tropical countries.

摘要

自多药疗法引入后,尚无一致证据表明麻风传播已减少,因此中断麻风传播是麻风控制项目的主要挑战之一。传染源主要是细菌载量高且有或无麻风临床症状的人。拥有一种简单的检测系统来检测针对麻风分枝杆菌酚糖脂-I(PGL-I)的抗体,以识别这些个体,对于预防传播可能很重要。我们开发了一种侧向流动检测法,即ML Flow检测法,用于检测PGL-I抗体,该检测只需10分钟即可完成。酶联免疫吸附测定法与我们的检测法之间的一致性为91%;超出偶然的一致性(kappa值)为0.77。我们通过比较来自高流行区的539份血液和血清样本,评估了全血的使用情况。观察到的一致性为85.9%(kappa = 0.70)。将侧向流动检测条和运行缓冲液在28摄氏度下储存长达1年不影响检测结果。ML Flow检测法正确分类多菌型患者的敏感性为97.4%。基于对照组结果,ML Flow检测法的特异性为90.2%。ML Flow检测法是一种快速且易于操作的检测针对麻风分枝杆菌PGL-I的免疫球蛋白M抗体的方法。它不需要任何特殊设备,高度稳定 的试剂使检测可靠且适用于热带国家。

相似文献

5
Leprosy serology using PGL-I: a systematic review.使用酚糖脂-I的麻风血清学:一项系统评价
Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2008;41 Suppl 2:11-8. doi: 10.1590/s0037-86822008000700004.

引用本文的文献

3
A Multicenter evaluation of leprosy rapid test Fast ML Flow Hanseníase in Brazil.巴西麻风快速检测法Fast ML Flow Hanseníase的多中心评估
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Apr;44(4):985-995. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05071-2. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
6
Challenges and advances in serological and molecular tests to aid leprosy diagnosis.血清学和分子检测在麻风病诊断中的挑战和进展。
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2023 Nov;248(22):2083-2094. doi: 10.1177/15353702231209422. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
8
ML Flow serological test: complementary tool in leprosy.ML Flow 血清学检测:麻风病的补充工具。
An Bras Dermatol. 2023 May-Jun;98(3):331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2022.05.005. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Seroepidemiologic survey of the household contacts of leprosy patients.麻风病患者家庭接触者的血清流行病学调查。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022 Nov 21;68(10):1389-1393. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20220248. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

6
The contribution of serological tests to leprosy control.血清学检测对麻风病防治的贡献。
Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis. 1996 Dec;64(4 Suppl):S63-6; discussion S66-7.
8
Leprosy: the epidemiology of a slow bacterium.麻风病:一种慢速细菌的流行病学
Epidemiol Rev. 1982;4:161-88. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036245.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验