Richardus Renate A, van der Zwet Konrad, van Hooij Anouk, Wilson Louis, Oskam Linda, Faber Roel, van den Eeden Susan J F, Pahan David, Alam Khorshed, Richardus Jan Hendrik, Geluk Annemieke
Department of Infectious Diseases Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Dec 11;11(12):e0006083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006083. eCollection 2017 Dec.
Despite elimination efforts, the number of Mycobacterium leprae (M. leprae) infected individuals who develop leprosy, is still substantial. Solid evidence exists that individuals living in close proximity to patients are at increased risk to develop leprosy. Early diagnosis of leprosy in endemic areas requires field-friendly tests that identify individuals at risk of developing the disease before clinical manifestation. Such assays will simultaneously contribute to reduction of current diagnostic delay as well as transmission. Antibody (Ab) levels directed against the M.leprae-specific phenolic glycolipid I (PGL-I) represents a surrogate marker for bacterial load. However, it is insufficiently defined whether anti-PGL-I antibodies can be utilized as prognostic biomarkers for disease in contacts. Particularly, in Bangladesh, where paucibacillary (PB) patients form the majority of leprosy cases, anti-PGL-I serology is an inadequate method for leprosy screening in contacts as a directive for prophylactic treatment.
Between 2002 and 2009, fingerstick blood from leprosy patients' contacts without clinical signs of disease from a field-trial in Bangladesh was collected on filter paper at three time points covering six years of follow-up per person. Analysis of anti-PGL-I Ab levels for 25 contacts who developed leprosy during follow-up and 199 contacts who were not diagnosed with leprosy, was performed by ELISA after elution of bloodspots from filter paper.
Anti-PGL-I Ab levels at intake did not significantly differ between contacts who developed leprosy during the study and those who remained free of disease. Moreover, anti-PGL-I serology was not prognostic in this population as no significant correlation was identified between anti-PGL-I Ab levels at intake and the onset of leprosy.
In this highly endemic population in Bangladesh, no association was observed between anti-PGL-I Ab levels and onset of disease, urging the need for an extended, more specific biomarker signature for early detection of leprosy in this area.
ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN61223447.
尽管开展了消除麻风病的工作,但感染麻风分枝杆菌(M. leprae)后发病的人数仍然可观。有确凿证据表明,与患者密切接触的个体患麻风病的风险会增加。在流行地区,麻风病的早期诊断需要便于现场操作的检测方法,以便在临床表现出现之前识别出有患病风险的个体。此类检测将有助于减少当前的诊断延误以及疾病传播。针对麻风分枝杆菌特异性酚糖脂I(PGL-I)的抗体(Ab)水平代表细菌载量的替代标志物。然而,抗PGL-I抗体是否可作为接触者疾病的预后生物标志物尚未明确界定。特别是在孟加拉国,少菌型(PB)患者占麻风病病例的大多数,抗PGL-I血清学作为预防性治疗的指导,并非用于接触者麻风病筛查的充分方法。
在2002年至2009年期间,从孟加拉国一项现场试验中未出现疾病临床症状的麻风病患者接触者中采集手指血,每人在三个时间点采集到滤纸上,涵盖六年的随访期。对随访期间患麻风病的25名接触者和未被诊断为麻风病的199名接触者的抗PGL-I Ab水平进行分析,方法是从滤纸上洗脱血斑后采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法。
在研究期间患麻风病的接触者与未患病的接触者之间,摄入时的抗PGL-I Ab水平无显著差异。此外,抗PGL-I血清学在该人群中并无预后价值,因为摄入时的抗PGL-I Ab水平与麻风病发病之间未发现显著相关性。
在孟加拉国这个麻风病高度流行的人群中,未观察到抗PGL-I Ab水平与疾病发病之间存在关联,这表明需要一种更广泛、更具特异性的生物标志物特征用于该地区麻风病的早期检测。
ClinicalTrials.gov ISRCTN61223447