Alvisi Valentina, Romanello Anna, Badet Michel, Gaillard Sandrine, Philit Francois, Guérin Claude
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Ferrara, Italy.
Chest. 2003 May;123(5):1625-32. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.5.1625.
(1) To determine the incidence of expiratory flow limitation (FL) at ICU admission, at the time of extubation, and at ICU discharge in intubated patients with COPD receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure (ARF); and (2) to assess the feasibility of inspiratory capacity (IC) as an indication of pulmonary dynamic hyperinflation in this setting.
Prospective, observational pilot study with physiologic measurements performed at ICU admission and during the weaning process driven by the clinician. A 60-min T-tube trial was initiated once criteria for weaning were present. The decision to extubate or reventilate patients was made by the clinician at the end of this session. Assessment of failure or success of T-tube trials was performed independently.
A 25-bed ICU of a tertiary teaching university hospital.
Over a 13-month period, 25 intubated patients with COPD receiving mechanical ventilation for ARF were included.
None.
At ICU admission, FL assessed by the negative expiratory pressure test was measured under passive ventilatory conditions at the baseline ventilatory settings, on zero end-expiratory pressure, and in a semirecumbent position. During weaning, FL, respiratory pattern, and IC were measured during T-tube trials, before extubation, 1 h after extubation, and at ICU discharge. At ICU admission, 24 of 25 patients presented FL with, on average, 73 +/- 22% of the tidal volume. Ten patients were unavailable for follow-up due to death (n = 6) unplanned extubation (n = 3), or refusal (n = 1), so that only 15 patients completed the whole protocol (all 15 patients were extubated). For these 15 patients, the incidence of FL was 93% at ICU admission, 47% before extubation, and 40% at ICU discharge. IC was significantly greater at ICU discharge than before extubation (36 +/- 11% predicted vs 44 +/- 12% predicted, p < 0.01) and in successful T-tube trials compared with unsuccessful T-tube trials (38 +/- 13% predicted vs 24 +/- 8% predicted, p < 0.01).
The incidence of expiratory FL is high in patients with COPD receiving mechanical ventilation, and is reduced during aggressive therapy when the patient is placed on mechanical ventilatory support and the time that weaning begins during the ICU stay. IC was lower in patients in whom weaning was unsuccessful. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm these preliminary results.
(1)确定因急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)接受机械通气的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)插管患者在入住重症监护病房(ICU)时、拔管时以及ICU出院时呼气气流受限(FL)的发生率;(2)评估吸气容量(IC)作为该情况下肺动态过度充气指标的可行性。
前瞻性观察性试点研究,在ICU入院时以及由临床医生主导的撤机过程中进行生理测量。一旦出现撤机标准,即启动60分钟的T管试验。在该试验结束时,由临床医生决定患者是否拔管或重新通气。T管试验失败或成功的评估独立进行。
一所拥有25张床位的三级教学大学医院的ICU。
在13个月期间,纳入了25例因ARF接受机械通气的COPD插管患者。
无。
在ICU入院时,通过呼气负压试验评估的FL在被动通气条件下,于基线通气设置、呼气末正压为零时以及半卧位时进行测量。在撤机期间,在T管试验期间、拔管前、拔管后1小时以及ICU出院时测量FL、呼吸模式和IC。在ICU入院时,25例患者中有24例存在FL,平均潮气量的73±22%受限。由于死亡(n = 6)、意外拔管(n = 3)或拒绝(n = 1),10例患者无法进行随访,因此只有15例患者完成了整个方案(所有15例患者均已拔管)。对于这15例患者,FL的发生率在ICU入院时为93%,拔管前为47%,ICU出院时为40%。ICU出院时的IC显著高于拔管前(预测值分别为36±11%和44±12%,p < 0.01),与T管试验失败的患者相比,成功的T管试验患者的IC更高(预测值分别为38±13%和24±8%,p < 0.01)。
接受机械通气的COPD患者呼气FL的发生率较高,在积极治疗期间,当患者接受机械通气支持以及在ICU住院期间开始撤机时,该发生率会降低。撤机不成功的患者IC较低。需要进一步的大规模研究来证实这些初步结果。