Suppr超能文献

过氧化脲制剂和脱敏牙膏对牙釉质显微硬度的影响。

Effects of a carbamide peroxide agent and desensitizing dentifrices on enamel microhardness.

作者信息

de Oliveira Rogério, Basting Roberta Tarkany, Rodrigues José Augusto, Rodrigues Antonio Luiz, Serra Mônica Campos

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 2003 Feb;16(1):42-6.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the in vitro microhardness of enamel treated with a 10% carbamide peroxide agent and two desensitizing dentifrices at different bleaching times.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching agent was evaluated (Rembrandt 10%) (REM). A placebo agent was used as a control group (PLA). The bleaching and the placebo agents were applied to human enamel dental fragments for 8 hours per day, followed by immersion for 5 minutes in a slurry solution of desensitizing dentifrices: Sensodyne (S) or Sensodyne Fluor (SF). During the remaining time, the enamel fragments were individually stored in 13.5 ml of artificial saliva. Knoop microhardness measurements were performed at baseline, 8 hours, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days of treatment and at 7 and 14 days of a post-treatment period.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance and Tukey's test showed no differences in enamel microhardness for REM + SF (P=0.069) and PLA + SF (P=0.93) within each time interval. The dental fragments treated with REM + S and PLA + S showed an increase in microhardness values within each time interval (P<0.0001). There were significant differences among the treatment agents from the 28th to the 56th day. The use of 10% carbamide peroxide bleaching and a desensitizing dentifrice significantly increased the enamel microhardness values during the bleaching treatment and after 14 days after the completion of the treatment. After the post-treatment period, the enamel fragments treated with a placebo agent and with a 10% carbamide peroxide agent and with a desensitizing fluoride dentifrice maintained the baseline values.

摘要

目的

评估用10%过氧化脲试剂和两种脱敏牙膏在不同漂白时间处理后的牙釉质体外显微硬度。

材料与方法

评估一种10%过氧化脲漂白剂(Rembrandt 10%)(REM)。使用一种安慰剂试剂作为对照组(PLA)。将漂白剂和安慰剂试剂每天应用于人类牙釉质碎片8小时,然后在脱敏牙膏(舒适达(S)或舒适达氟化物(SF))的浆液中浸泡5分钟。在剩余时间里,牙釉质碎片分别保存在13.5毫升人工唾液中。在治疗的基线、8小时、7天、14天、21天、28天、35天和42天以及治疗后7天和14天进行努氏显微硬度测量。

结果

方差分析和Tukey检验显示,在每个时间间隔内,REM + SF组(P = 0.069)和PLA + SF组(P = 0.93)的牙釉质显微硬度无差异。用REM + S和PLA + S处理的牙碎片在每个时间间隔内显微硬度值均有所增加(P < 0.0001)。从第28天到第56天,各治疗试剂之间存在显著差异。在漂白治疗期间以及治疗完成后14天,使用10%过氧化脲漂白剂和脱敏牙膏显著提高了牙釉质显微硬度值。在治疗后阶段,用安慰剂试剂、10%过氧化脲试剂和含氟脱敏牙膏处理的牙釉质碎片保持了基线值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验