Sutphen Sally M, Cibula Donald A, Morrow Cynthia B, Epling John W, Novick Lloyd F
SUNY-Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York 13210, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2003 May;24(4 Suppl):90-4. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00027-8.
Evaluating the acquisition of skills in prevention is an increasing priority in prevention education. Assessment instruments were developed to measure student skills before and after an education intervention at State University of New York (SUNY)-Upstate Medical University.
The evaluation method used three testing instruments that measure preventive medicine skills. We selected three surrogate topics, each their own instrument: sexually transmitted disease, lead toxicity, and ischemic heart disease. All three instruments measure four key preventive medicine skills areas: (1) using and interpreting data sources; (2) measuring disease frequency, including incidence and prevalence; (3) making inferences and identifying bias in data presentations; and (4) identifying appropriate study design and screening tests. Second-year medical students were assessed before and after our preventive medicine course in spring 2002, using our evaluative instruments.
Before and after instruction analysis, overall, and by skills area tested revealed a significant increase in student preventive medicine skills (p< or =0.001) in all four categories. On conclusion of the case-based curriculum, students were also asked to rate the cases. The majority (60%) of the students thought the cases were of value to their medical education, and 58% believed that they added to their skills in population prevention.
These instruments can measure change in preventive medicine skills before and after a course in preventive medicine.
评估预防技能的掌握情况在预防教育中日益受到重视。纽约州立大学上州医科大学开发了评估工具,用于测量教育干预前后学生的技能。
评估方法使用了三种测量预防医学技能的测试工具。我们选择了三个替代主题,每个主题都有各自的工具:性传播疾病、铅中毒和缺血性心脏病。所有三种工具都测量四个关键的预防医学技能领域:(1)使用和解释数据源;(2)测量疾病频率,包括发病率和患病率;(3)在数据呈现中进行推断并识别偏差;(4)识别合适的研究设计和筛查测试。2002年春季,在我们的预防医学课程前后,使用我们的评估工具对二年级医学生进行了评估。
在教学前后进行分析,总体而言,按测试的技能领域来看,所有四个类别中学生的预防医学技能都有显著提高(p≤0.001)。在基于案例的课程结束时,还要求学生对案例进行评分。大多数(60%)学生认为这些案例对他们的医学教育有价值,58%的学生认为这些案例提高了他们在群体预防方面的技能。
这些工具可以测量预防医学课程前后预防医学技能的变化。