Mathiassen Svend Erik, Möller Therése, Forsman Mikael
School of Technology and Society, Malmö University, Sweden.
Ergonomics. 2003 Jun 20;46(8):800-24. doi: 10.1080/0014013031000090125.
Data on exposure variability is an important remedy for designing and interpreting studies of occupational ergonomics. The present study aimed at retrieving the within- and between-subjects variance of several mechanical exposure parameters in a repeated, short-cycle task. Seven experienced operators repeatedly secured joints using two types of hand-held nutrunners. The joints were placed in three different locations on a rack, simulating automotive assembly. Bilateral muscle activity from the upper trapezius and the lower arm extensors, as well as head and upper arm inclination was continuously monitored. Exposure levels and their variance components were assessed in several data subsets using ANOVA. The results were interpreted in terms of statistical precision and power, and discussed as markers of important ergonomic qualities. A substantial exposure variability was found within and between subjects in all joint locations and for both tools. For mixed work across tools and locations, the necessary number of subjects to arrive at a group mean exposure with 95% confidence limits corresponding to +/- 10% of the mean ranged between 8 and 158, with posture recordings tending to require smaller populations than muscle activity recordings. Within-subject variance increased 2- to 37-fold, depending on exposure parameter, when work was 'enlarged' from securings with a specified location and tool to a mix of all locations and tools. Systematic differences between subjects in variability and responsiveness to 'work enlargement' indicated individualized motor control strategies. The results illustrate the importance of exposure variability data to the design of proper measurement strategies. They also suggest that the sizes of exposure variability per se can be interpreted as operational indices of what is thought to be important ergonomic risk indicators, such as the 'sameness' of repeated operations and the allowance for flexible working techniques.
暴露变异性数据是设计和解释职业工效学研究的重要补充。本研究旨在获取重复短周期任务中几个机械暴露参数的受试者内和受试者间方差。七名经验丰富的操作员使用两种手持式螺母扳手反复固定接头。接头放置在架子上的三个不同位置,模拟汽车装配。持续监测上斜方肌和下臂伸肌的双侧肌肉活动,以及头部和上臂倾斜度。使用方差分析在几个数据子集中评估暴露水平及其方差成分。结果从统计精度和功效方面进行解释,并作为重要工效学质量指标进行讨论。在所有接头位置和两种工具中,受试者内和受试者间均发现了显著的暴露变异性。对于跨工具和位置的混合工作,要在95%置信区间内得出组平均暴露量,且置信区间对应于均值的+/-10%,所需的受试者数量在8至158之间,姿势记录所需的样本量往往比肌肉活动记录要少。当工作从使用特定位置和工具的固定操作“扩大”到所有位置和工具的混合操作时,受试者内方差根据暴露参数增加了2至37倍。受试者在变异性和对“工作扩大”的反应性方面的系统差异表明存在个体化的运动控制策略。结果说明了暴露变异性数据对设计适当测量策略的重要性。它们还表明,暴露变异性本身的大小可以解释为一些被认为是重要工效学风险指标的操作指标,如重复操作的“相同性”和灵活工作技术的余量。