Möller Therése, Mathiassen Svend Erik, Franzon Helena, Kihlberg Steve
Department of Work and Health, National Institute for Working Life, SE-113 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ergonomics. 2004 Jan 15;47(1):19-40. doi: 10.1080/0014013032000121651.
Cyclic assembly work is known to imply a high risk for musculoskeletal disorders. To have operators rotate between work tasks is believed to be one way of decreasing this risk, since it is expected to increase variation in mechanical and psychological exposures (physical and mental loads). This assumption was investigated by assessing mechanical exposure variability in three assembly tasks in an electronics assembly plant, each on a separate workstation, as well as in a 'job enlargement' scenario combining all three stations. Five experienced operators worked for 1 h on each station. Data on upper trapezius and forearm extensor muscle activity were obtained by means of electromyography (EMG), and working postures of the head and upper arms were assessed by inclinometry. The cycle-to-cycle variance of parameters representing the three exposure dimensions: level, frequency and duration was estimated using ANOVA algorithms for each workstation separately as well as for a balanced combination of all three. For a particular station, the variability of trapezius EMG activity levels relative to the mean was higher than for extensor EMG: between-cycles coefficients of variation (CV) about 0.15 and 0.10, respectively. A similar relationship between CV applied to the parameter describing frequency of EMG activity. Except for head inclination levels, the between-cycles CV was larger for posture parameters than for EMG. The between-cycles variance increased up to six fold in the job enlargement scenario, as compared to working at only one station. The difference in mean exposure between workstations was larger for trapezius EMG parameters than for forearm extensor EMG and postures, and hence the effect of job enlargement on exposure variability was more pronounced for the trapezius. For some stations, job enlargement even implied less cycle-to-cycle variability in forearm extensor EMG parameters than working at that station only. Whether the changes in exposure variability associated with job enlargement were sufficient to imply a decreased risk for musculoskeletal disorders is not known.
众所周知,循环装配工作意味着肌肉骨骼疾病的高风险。让操作员在工作任务之间轮换被认为是降低这种风险的一种方法,因为预计这会增加机械和心理暴露(身体和精神负荷)的变化。通过评估一家电子装配厂中三个装配任务的机械暴露变异性来研究这一假设,每个任务在一个单独的工作站上进行,同时也在一个将所有三个工作站结合在一起的“工作扩大化”场景中进行评估。五名经验丰富的操作员在每个工作站工作1小时。通过肌电图(EMG)获得斜方肌上部和前臂伸肌的肌肉活动数据,并通过倾角测量法评估头部和上臂的工作姿势。分别使用方差分析算法对每个工作站以及所有三个工作站的平衡组合估计代表三个暴露维度(水平、频率和持续时间)的参数的逐周期方差。对于特定的工作站,斜方肌肌电图活动水平相对于平均值的变异性高于伸肌肌电图:周期间变异系数(CV)分别约为0.15和0.10。应用于描述肌电图活动频率的参数的CV之间存在类似的关系。除了头部倾斜水平外,姿势参数的周期间CV大于肌电图。与仅在一个工作站工作相比,在工作扩大化场景中,周期间方差增加了六倍。工作站之间斜方肌肌电图参数的平均暴露差异大于前臂伸肌肌电图和姿势,因此工作扩大化对暴露变异性的影响在斜方肌上更为明显。对于某些工作站,工作扩大化甚至意味着前臂伸肌肌电图参数的周期间变异性比仅在该工作站工作时更小。与工作扩大化相关的暴露变异性变化是否足以意味着肌肉骨骼疾病风险的降低尚不清楚。