Harris W F
Optometric Science Research Group, Department of Optometry, Rand Afrikaans University, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, 2006 South Africa.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2003 May;23(3):251-61. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2003.00112.x.
Traditional treatments of spectacle magnification for distant objects consider only stigmatic spectacle lenses and they compare the retinal image size in a refractively fully compensated eye with the image size in the uncompensated eye. Spectacle magnification is expressed as a product of two factors, the power and shape factors of the lens. The power factor depends on the position of the entrance pupil of the eye. For an eye with an astigmatic cornea, however, the position of the entrance pupil is not well defined. Thus, the traditional approach to spectacle magnification does not generalize properly to allow for astigmatism. Within the constraints of linear optics and subject to the restriction that the eye's iris remains the aperture stop, this paper provides a complete, unified and exact treatment for optical instruments in general. It compares retinal image size in a generalized sense (including image shape and orientation) for any instrument in front of an eye with that of the eye alone irrespective of whether the instrument compensates or not. The approach does not make use of the concept of the entrance pupil at all and it allows for astigmatism and for non-alignment of refracting elements in the instrument and in the eye. The concept of spectacle magnification generalizes to the concept of instrument size magnification. Instrument size magnification can be expressed as the product of two matrix factors one of which can be interpreted as a power factor (as back-vertex power) and the other factor for which the name dilation factor is more appropriate in general. The general treatment is then applied to a number of special cases including afocal instruments, spectacle lenses (including obliquely crossing thick bitoric lenses), contact lenses, stigmatic systems and stigmatic eyes. In the case of spectacle lenses, the dilation factor reduces to the usual shape factor.
传统的用于远处物体的眼镜放大率处理方法仅考虑无像散的眼镜镜片,并且它们比较的是屈光完全矫正眼的视网膜图像大小与未矫正眼的图像大小。眼镜放大率表示为两个因素的乘积,即镜片的屈光力因素和形状因素。屈光力因素取决于眼睛入瞳的位置。然而,对于角膜有散光的眼睛,入瞳的位置并不明确。因此,传统的眼镜放大率处理方法不能很好地推广以适应散光情况。在线性光学的约束条件下,并且在眼睛的虹膜保持孔径光阑的限制下,本文对一般的光学仪器提供了一种完整、统一且精确的处理方法。它从广义上比较了眼睛前方任何仪器所成的视网膜图像大小(包括图像形状和方向)与眼睛单独成像时的视网膜图像大小,而不管该仪器是否进行了矫正。该方法根本没有使用入瞳的概念,并且它考虑了散光以及仪器和眼睛中折射元件的不对准情况。眼镜放大率的概念推广到了仪器尺寸放大率的概念。仪器尺寸放大率可以表示为两个矩阵因素的乘积,其中一个因素可以解释为屈光力因素(作为后顶点屈光力),另一个因素一般来说用“放大因子”这个名称更合适。然后将这种一般处理方法应用于一些特殊情况,包括无焦仪器、眼镜镜片(包括斜交的厚双曲面镜片)、隐形眼镜、无像散系统和无像散眼睛。对于眼镜镜片的情况,放大因子简化为通常的形状因子。