• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年早期和中期的人格发展:一成不变还是持续变化?

Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change?

作者信息

Srivastava Sanjay, John Oliver P, Gosling Samuel D, Potter Jeff

机构信息

Institute of Personality and Social Research, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 May;84(5):1041-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041.

DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041
PMID:12757147
Abstract

Different theories make different predictions about how mean levels of personality traits change in adulthood. The biological view of the Five-factor theory proposes the plaster hypothesis: All personality traits stop changing by age 30. In contrast, contextualist perspectives propose that changes should be more varied and should persist throughout adulthood. This study compared these perspectives in a large (N = 132,515) sample of adults aged 21-60 who completed a Big Five personality measure on the Internet. Conscientiousness and Agreeableness increased throughout early and middle adulthood at varying rates; Neuroticism declined among women but did not change among men. The variety in patterns of change suggests that the Big Five traits are complex phenomena subject to a variety of developmental influences.

摘要

不同的理论对于成年期人格特质平均水平如何变化有着不同的预测。五因素理论的生物学观点提出了“石膏假说”:所有人格特质在30岁时停止变化。相比之下,情境主义观点则认为变化应该更加多样,并且会贯穿成年期持续存在。本研究在一个由21至60岁成年人组成的大样本(N = 132,515)中比较了这些观点,这些成年人在互联网上完成了一项大五人格测量。尽责性和宜人性在成年早期和中期以不同的速率增加;神经质在女性中下降,但在男性中没有变化。变化模式的多样性表明,大五人格特质是复杂的现象,受到多种发展影响。

相似文献

1
Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change?成年早期和中期的人格发展:一成不变还是持续变化?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 May;84(5):1041-53. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1041.
2
Development of big five domains and facets in adulthood: mean-level age trends and broadly versus narrowly acting mechanisms.成人期大五人格领域和特质的发展:平均年龄趋势和广泛与狭隘作用机制。
J Pers. 2012 Aug;80(4):881-914. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00752.x. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
3
Stability and change of personality across the life course: the impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big Five.人格在整个生命历程中的稳定性和变化:年龄和重大生活事件对五大人格特质的均数稳定性和等级稳定性的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):862-82. doi: 10.1037/a0024950.
4
Long-term stability in the Big Five personality traits in adulthood.成年期大五人格特质的长期稳定性。
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Dec;48(6):511-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00609.x.
5
Trajectories of prosocial behavior from adolescence to early adulthood: associations with personality change.从青春期到成年早期亲社会行为的轨迹:与人格变化的关联。
J Adolesc. 2014 Jul;37(5):701-13. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
6
An Economic Perspective on Personality Traits and Alcohol Misuse: Evidence from the Health and Retirement Study.人格特质与酒精滥用的经济学视角:来自健康与退休研究的证据。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2015 Jun;18(2):75-92.
7
Cohort differences in Big Five personality factors over a period of 25 years.25 年来大五人格因素的队列差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Jun;100(6):1124-38. doi: 10.1037/a0022874.
8
The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20.大五人格自我报告的发展心理测量学:从10岁到20岁的默许、因素结构、连贯性和差异性
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Apr;94(4):718-37. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718.
9
Personality development across the life span: longitudinal analyses with a national sample from Germany.人格发展贯穿一生:德国全国样本的纵向分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Oct;101(4):847-61. doi: 10.1037/a0024298.
10
A longitudinal study of the relationships between the Big Five personality traits and body size perception.大五人格特质与身体大小感知关系的纵向研究。
Body Image. 2015 Jun;14:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality stability and change across the academic semester.整个学术学期中的人格稳定性与变化
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 27;16:1531794. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1531794. eCollection 2025.
2
An investigation of acute physiological and psychological moderators of psychedelic-induced personality change among healthy volunteers.一项关于健康志愿者中致幻剂诱发人格改变的急性生理和心理调节因素的调查。
Neurosci Appl. 2024 Dec 2;4:104092. doi: 10.1016/j.nsa.2024.104092. eCollection 2025.
3
Personality Traits in Adolescents with ADHD: Insights into Dimension Evaluation and Clinical Implications Using the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 Questionnaire.
注意缺陷多动障碍青少年的人格特质:使用《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版问卷人格量表对维度评估及临床意义的见解
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3048. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093048.
4
Associations Between Personality Traits and Longitudinal Change in Physical Function in Survivors of Childhood Cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的人格特质与身体功能纵向变化之间的关联
Cancer Med. 2025 May;14(9):e70965. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70965.
5
The Bangla Big Five Inventory-2: a comprehensive psychometric validation.孟加拉大五人格量表-2:全面的心理测量学验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 31;15(1):11008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90264-0.
6
Optimistic and pessimistic cognitive judgement bias modulates the stress response and cancer progression in zebrafish.乐观和悲观的认知判断偏差调节斑马鱼的应激反应和癌症进展。
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 30;15(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03311-9.
7
The multiple self and psychological openness.多重自我与心理开放性。
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 12;15:1441953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1441953. eCollection 2024.
8
Is Self-Report of Attachment Patterns in Young People Stable From Three to Nine Months After a Concussion?青少年脑震荡后3至9个月,其依恋模式的自我报告是否稳定?
Scand J Psychol. 2025 Aug;66(4):459-472. doi: 10.1111/sjop.13094. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
9
Early harmonies, enduring echoes-how early life experiences and personality traits shape music performance anxiety.早期的和谐,持久的回响——早期生活经历和个性特征如何塑造音乐表演焦虑。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 22;15:1360011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1360011. eCollection 2024.
10
Role of Psychological Factors in Migraine.心理因素在偏头痛中的作用。
Cureus. 2024 Dec 17;16(12):e75858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75858. eCollection 2024 Dec.