Coats A C, Hebert F, Atwood G R
Arch Otolaryngol. 1976 Jun;102(6):343-54. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1976.00780110055005.
We studied the normal air caloric response's intensity and variability. Intensities of "preliminary standard" (47 C, 25 C, 60 seconds, 10 liters/min) air and standard bithermal water responses were the same, but the air responses were more variable. Control experiments suggested that the tendency of the air stream to equilibrate toward ambient may account for much of air's relatively high variability. Increasing the air irrigation's duration, flow rate, and separation from body temperature increased response intensity. Air's test-retest variability decreased when flow rate and duration increased and when temperature approached ambient. Therefore, we suggested that irrigating temperatures be chosen as close to ambient as possible and duration and flow rate be made as large as possible. From a table equating air and standard bithermal water responses, we selected tentative clinical air irrigation parameters of 27.5 C, 45.5 C, 100 seconds, and 13 liters/min.
我们研究了正常空气冷热反应的强度和变异性。“初步标准”(47℃、25℃、60秒、10升/分钟)空气反应和标准双温热水反应的强度相同,但空气反应的变异性更大。对照实验表明,气流趋向于与环境平衡的趋势可能是空气相对较高变异性的主要原因。增加空气冲洗的持续时间、流速以及与体温的差值会增加反应强度。当流速和持续时间增加以及温度接近环境温度时,空气的重测变异性会降低。因此,我们建议选择尽可能接近环境温度的冲洗温度,并使持续时间和流速尽可能大。根据一张将空气反应与标准双温热水反应等同的表格,我们选择了27.5℃、45.5℃、100秒和13升/分钟的初步临床空气冲洗参数。