Sica S., Avino S., Glielmi G., Cicero S.R.
Dipartimento di Malattie Infettive, Universita Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Infez Med. 1999;7(2):96-104.
Design: We evalueted incidence, period and etiology of the fever of difficult diagnosis (FDD) among 169 cases of fever of unknown origin (FUO) observed from 1-90 to 8-98. Materials and methods: we used the general and orientative diagnostic criteria useful for identifying some pathologies and also for distinguishing between infectious and non infectious fevers. Only as last attempt to solve the problem did we adopt ex-adiuvantibus treatments. Results: FDD incidence was 29.58%; we identified four main categories after detailed diagnostic work up:1) Fictitious fevers and abitual hyperthermia; 2) Systemic vasculitis with atypical clinical features; 3) Rheumatic polymyalgia; 4) Steroid-responder fevers. Conclusion: FDD is not a rare event, but of complicated resolution, some remaining unsolved. Our experience suggests that we consider only a few elements at first to distinguish organic from sine materia fevers: age, history of recent surgery, general clinical picture and aspecific indexes of inflammation.
我们评估了1990年1月至1998年8月期间观察到的169例不明原因发热(FUO)患者中疑难诊断性发热(FDD)的发病率、病程及病因。材料与方法:我们采用了通用和定向诊断标准,这些标准有助于识别某些疾病,也有助于区分感染性和非感染性发热。仅在解决问题的最后尝试中,我们才采用了试验性治疗。结果:FDD的发病率为29.58%;经过详细的诊断检查后,我们确定了四个主要类别:1)假性发热和习惯性体温过高;2)具有非典型临床特征的系统性血管炎;3)风湿性多肌痛;4)类固醇反应性发热。结论:FDD并非罕见事件,但解决起来较为复杂,有些问题仍未解决。我们的经验表明,一开始只需考虑几个因素来区分器质性发热和非器质性发热:年龄、近期手术史、一般临床表现和非特异性炎症指标。