Janusz Jennifer A, Kirkwood Michael W, Yeates Keith Owen, Taylor H Gerry
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University and Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Child Neuropsychol. 2002 Sep;8(3):179-94. doi: 10.1076/chin.8.3.179.13499.
The effects of childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) on social problem-solving were examined in 35 children with severe TBI, 40 children with moderate TBI, and 46 children with orthopedic injuries (OI). The children were recruited prospectively following injuries that occurred between 6 and 12 years of age. They were followed longitudinally, and ranged from 9 to 18 years of age at the time of the current study, which occurred on average 4 years post injury. They were administered a semi-structured interview used in previous research on social problem-solving to assess the developmental level of their responses to hypothetical dilemmas involving social conflict. Children in the severe TBI group defined the social dilemmas and generated alternative strategies to solve those dilemmas at the same developmental level as did children in the OI group. However, they articulated lower-level strategies as the best way to solve the dilemmas and used lower-level reasoning to evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies. After controlling for group membership, race, socioeconomic status, IQ, and age, children's social problem-solving, and particularly the developmental level of their preferred strategies for resolving conflicts, predicted parents ratings of children's social skills, peer relationships, aggressive behavior, and academic performance. The findings indicate that children with severe TBI demonstrate selective, long-term deficits in their social problem-solving skills that may help to account for their poor social and academic outcomes.
研究人员对35名重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)儿童、40名中度TBI儿童和46名骨科损伤(OI)儿童进行了研究,以考察儿童期创伤性脑损伤对社会问题解决能力的影响。这些儿童是在6至12岁受伤后前瞻性招募的。他们接受了纵向随访,在本研究进行时年龄在9至18岁之间,本研究平均在受伤后4年进行。研究人员让他们接受了一项先前用于社会问题解决研究的半结构化访谈,以评估他们对涉及社会冲突的假设困境的反应的发展水平。重度TBI组的儿童界定社会困境并提出解决这些困境的替代策略的发展水平与OI组儿童相同。然而,他们将较低水平的策略阐述为解决困境的最佳方式,并使用较低水平的推理来评估策略的有效性。在控制了组别、种族、社会经济地位、智商和年龄后,儿童的社会问题解决能力,尤其是他们解决冲突的首选策略的发展水平,预测了父母对儿童社交技能、同伴关系、攻击行为和学业成绩的评分。研究结果表明,重度TBI儿童在社会问题解决技能方面表现出选择性的长期缺陷,这可能有助于解释他们较差的社会和学业成果。