Suppr超能文献

青少年创伤性脑损伤在线问题解决:仅针对青少年的干预措施的原理、方法和初步可行性。

Teen online problem solving for teens with traumatic brain injury: Rationale, methods, and preliminary feasibility of a teen only intervention.

机构信息

Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati.

出版信息

Rehabil Psychol. 2017 Aug;62(3):290-299. doi: 10.1037/rep0000160.

Abstract

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: To describe the Teen Online Problem Solving-Teen Only (TOPS-TO) intervention relative to the original Teen Online Problem Solving-Family (TOPS-F) intervention, to describe a randomized controlled trial to assess intervention efficacy, and to report feasibility and acceptability of the TOPS-TO intervention. Research method and design: This is a multisite randomized controlled trial, including 152 teens (49 TOPS-F, 51 TOPS-TO, 52 IRC) between the ages of 11-18 who were hospitalized for a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in the previous 18 months. Assessments were completed at baseline, 6-months post baseline, and 12-months post baseline. Data discussed include adherence and satisfaction data collected at the 6-month assessment (treatment completion) for TOPS-F and TOPS-TO.

RESULTS

Adherence measures (sessions completed, dropout rates, duration of treatment engagement, and rates of program completion) were similar across treatment groups. Overall, teen and parent reported satisfaction was high and similar across groups. Teens spent a similar amount of time on the TOPS website across groups, and parents in the TOPS-F spent more time on the TOPS website than those in the TOPS-TO group (p = .002). Parents in the TOPS-F group rated the TOPS website as more helpful than those in the TOPS-TO group (p = .05).

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: TOPS-TO intervention is a feasible and acceptable intervention approach. Parents may perceive greater benefit from the family based intervention. Further examination is required to understand the comparative efficacy in improving child and family outcomes, and who is likely to benefit from each approach. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

目的/目标:描述青少年在线问题解决-仅限青少年(TOPS-TO)干预相对于原始的青少年在线问题解决-家庭(TOPS-F)干预,描述一项随机对照试验以评估干预效果,并报告 TOPS-TO 干预的可行性和可接受性。研究方法和设计:这是一项多地点随机对照试验,包括 152 名年龄在 11-18 岁之间的青少年(49 名 TOPS-F、51 名 TOPS-TO、52 名 IRC),他们在过去 18 个月内因中度至重度创伤性脑损伤住院。评估在基线、基线后 6 个月和基线后 12 个月进行。讨论的数据包括在基线后 6 个月(治疗完成)评估时收集的 TOPS-F 和 TOPS-TO 的依从性和满意度数据。

结果

依从性测量(完成的课程、辍学率、治疗参与的持续时间和方案完成率)在治疗组之间相似。总体而言,青少年和家长报告的满意度高,且各组之间相似。青少年在 TOPS 网站上花费的时间相似,而 TOPS-F 组的家长在 TOPS 网站上花费的时间多于 TOPS-TO 组(p =.002)。TOPS-F 组的家长认为 TOPS 网站比 TOPS-TO 组更有帮助(p =.05)。

结论/意义:TOPS-TO 干预是一种可行且可接受的干预方法。父母可能会从基于家庭的干预中获得更大的益处。需要进一步研究以了解改善儿童和家庭结果的比较效果,以及谁可能从每种方法中受益。(PsycINFO 数据库记录

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验