Bennett D H, Evans D W, Raj M V
Br Heart J. 1975 Sep;37(9):971-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.37.9.971.
Left ventricular 'relative wall thickness', determined from the ratio between echocardiographic measurements of end-systolic wall thickness and cavity transverse dimension, was related to peak systolic intraventricular pressure in 15 normal subjects, in 15 patients with left ventricular volume or pressure overload without aortic stenosis, and in 23 patients with aortic stenosis. All these patients had a mean rate of circumferential fibre shortening greater than 1.0 circumference per second and were regarded as having good ventricular function. Relative wall thickness was found to be normal in cases of volume overload and to be increased in pressure overload, being proportional to the systolic intraventricular pressure. Values for the ratio of systolic intraventricular pressure to relative wall thickness in the normal subjects and patients without aortic stenosis were similar (mean 30 +/- 2.5). Based on this relation, estimates of peak systolic intraventricular pressure were made in the cases of aortic stenosis using the formula: systolic intraventricular pressure (kPa) equals 30 x wall thicknes divided by transverse dimension. Peak systolic aortic value gradients derived by subtracting brachial artery systolic pressure, measured by sphygmomanometer, from the echocardiographic estimates of intraventricular pressure compared favourably with the gradients measured at left heart catheterization (r equals 0.87, P less than 0.001). Aortic value orifice areas, derived from echocardiographic estimates of stroke volume, ejection time, and value gradient, ranged from 0.21 to 3.16 cm2 and appeared to correlate with the severity of aortic stenosis. All patients with aortic stenosis, with or without coexistent mild aortic regurgitation, who were recommended for aortic valve surgery, had estimated valve orifice areas of less than 0.8 cm2. A further 10 patients with pressure or volume overload had mean rates of circumferential fibre shortening of less than 1.0 circumference per second and were regarded as having poor ventricular function. In these cases values for relative wall thickness were lower than in those with good ventricular function and were not proportional to systolic intraventricular pressure. In patients with good left ventricular function systolic intraventricular pressure is proportional to, and can be estimated from, echocardiographic measurement of relative wall thickness.
左心室“相对室壁厚度”由超声心动图测量的收缩末期室壁厚度与心腔横向尺寸之比确定,在15名正常受试者、15名无主动脉瓣狭窄的左心室容量或压力超负荷患者以及23名主动脉瓣狭窄患者中,与收缩期室内压峰值相关。所有这些患者的平均圆周纤维缩短率均大于每秒1.0周,被视为心室功能良好。发现容量超负荷病例的相对室壁厚度正常,压力超负荷时相对室壁厚度增加,且与收缩期室内压成正比。正常受试者和无主动脉瓣狭窄患者的收缩期室内压与相对室壁厚度之比相似(平均30±2.5)。基于这种关系,使用公式对主动脉瓣狭窄病例的收缩期室内压峰值进行了估计:收缩期室内压(kPa)等于30乘以室壁厚度除以横向尺寸。通过从超声心动图估计的室内压中减去用血压计测量的肱动脉收缩压得出的收缩期主动脉峰值压力阶差,与左心导管检查测量的阶差相比良好(r等于0.87,P小于0.001)。由超声心动图估计的每搏量、射血时间和压力阶差得出的主动脉瓣口面积范围为0.21至3.16平方厘米,似乎与主动脉瓣狭窄的严重程度相关。所有被推荐进行主动脉瓣手术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者,无论有无并存轻度主动脉瓣反流,其估计的瓣口面积均小于0.8平方厘米。另外10名有压力或容量超负荷的患者,其平均圆周纤维缩短率小于每秒1.0周,被视为心室功能不良。在这些病例中,相对室壁厚度的值低于心室功能良好的患者,且与收缩期室内压不成正比。在左心室功能良好的患者中,收缩期室内压与超声心动图测量的相对室壁厚度成正比,并且可以据此进行估计。